2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive enhancement integral values in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast carcinoma: Ductal carcinoma in situ vs. invasive ductal carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upstaging of DCIS to invasive carcinoma has implications for treatment planning. In this dataset, the rate of upstaging from DCIS to DCIS with an invasive component was within the ranges previously identified and similar to the average rate of upstaging found in Brennan et al and Lee et al Our study shows that semiautomatically assessed MRI features may have a role in predicting patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS who are at increased risk for having an invasive component to their disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Upstaging of DCIS to invasive carcinoma has implications for treatment planning. In this dataset, the rate of upstaging from DCIS to DCIS with an invasive component was within the ranges previously identified and similar to the average rate of upstaging found in Brennan et al and Lee et al Our study shows that semiautomatically assessed MRI features may have a role in predicting patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS who are at increased risk for having an invasive component to their disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…While a CNB is typically sufficient for a pathologist to make a diagnosis of DCIS, the small total volume of tumor sampled by CNB may miss adjacent invasive cancer. At the time of definitive surgery, upstaging to invasive disease occurs in 3.5–56% of cases . A meta‐analysis of DCIS upstaging rates by Brennan et al concluded an average upstaging rate of 25.9%, while Lee et al reviewed the literature to find an average rate of 20.9%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in agreement with previous studies performed with other types of solid tumors, including orbital (23), breast (24,25), head and neck (26) and pancreatic tumors (11). A previous study in colorectal cancer is consistent with the present study (27).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We found that the D pf mean, 75 th , and 90 th percentile metrics were significantly higher in the group with the DCIS component <5% than in the group with the DCIS component ≥5%. It might be because perfusion rates increase from benign to DCIS to invasive cancer . Liu et al also reported that a higher value of the perfusion fraction was found in malignant tumors than that in benign lesions, and the high perfusion fraction purported high vascularity in malignant tumors .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%