2005
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200505001-00450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positional Differences In Fitness And Anthropometric Characteristics In Australian Football

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of aerobic fitness is well-documented within the AF literature (Table 4), with players showing well-developed aerobic capacities [41]. The duration and distances covered during the game demonstrate that the ability to produce energy aerobically during match-play is vital.…”
Section: Aerobic Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The importance of aerobic fitness is well-documented within the AF literature (Table 4), with players showing well-developed aerobic capacities [41]. The duration and distances covered during the game demonstrate that the ability to produce energy aerobically during match-play is vital.…”
Section: Aerobic Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, the increase in clangers (Table 3), tackles and contested possessions may also be a result of increased physical qualities [40,41] and match intensities over this period [16]. Elite players and elite youth players have an average 0.33-0.42 skill involvements (any touches of the football) per minute with no difference between playing standards [16].…”
Section: Technical Demandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Test scores were log-transformed prior to analysis to reduce bias arising from non-uniformity of error. Magnitudes of standardized differences in physiological and movement variables between the open and closed drills were interpreted with the following criteria: 0-0.2 trivial, 0.2-0.6 small, 0.6-1.2 moderate, 1.2-2.0 large, and >2.0 very large[18]. The mean differences in the kicking and handball volumes between the open and closed drills were evaluated using paired sample t-tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%