Position statement of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma on the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine Report, A National Trauma Care System

Jenkins, Donald H.; Winchell, Robert J.; Coimbra, Raúl; Rotondo, Michael F.; Weireter, Leonard J.; Bulger, Eileen M.; Kozar, Rosemary A.; Nathens, Avery B.; Reilly, Patrick; Henry, Sharon M.; Jiménez, María Fernanda; Chang, Michael; Coburn, Michael; Dodd, Jimm; Neal, Melanie; Rosen, J; Clemency, Jean; Hoyt, David B.; Stewart, Ronald M.

doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000001217

Cited by 50 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The use of the knowledge to action framework will potentially assist in the discovery of new knowledge that will ultimately lead to innovations including the development of an evidence-informed protocol toward the management of NCTH to eliminate these potentially preventable causes of death due to injury. 47 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The assessment of the current literature and identification of gaps in current knowledge in this scoping review will provide the basis for next steps in using the knowledge to action framework: develop new knowledge from knowledge creation, adapt knowledge to the current subject of discussion, assess the barriers and facilitators of the knowledge, implement the new knowledge, monitor the new knowledge after implementation, evaluate the outcomes of the knowledge and sustain the knowledge. The use of the knowledge to action framework will potentially assist in the discovery of new knowledge that will ultimately lead to innovations including the development of an evidence-informed protocol toward the management of NCTH to eliminate these potentially preventable causes of death due to injury 47…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage of the abdomen in civilian and military austere/remote environments: protocol for a scoping review

Adams

McDonald

Sullo

et al. 2021

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage in military austere/remote environments is a leading cause of potentially preventable death in the prehospital/battlefield environment that has not shown a decrease in mortality in 26 years. Numerous conceptual innovations to manage non-compressible torso hemorrhage have been developed without proven effectiveness in this setting. This scoping review aims to assess the current literature to define non-compressible torso hemorrhage in civilian and military austere/remote environments, assess current innovations and the effectiveness of these innovations, assess the current knowledge gaps and potential future innovations in the management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage in civilian and military austere/remote environments, and assess the translational health science perspective of the current literature and its potential effect on public health. The Joanna Briggs Institute for evidence synthesis will guide this scoping review to completion. A nine-step development process, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist, will be used to enhance the methodological and reporting quality of this scoping review. The Participant, Concept, Context framework will broaden this scoping review’s reach in developing a comprehensive search strategy. Thirty years will be explored to assess all relevant literature to ensure a thorough search. Two researchers will explore all the discovered literature and develop consensus on the selected literature included in this scoping review. The article will undergo review and data extraction for data analysis. The knowledge to action framework will guide the knowledge synthesis and creation of this scoping review. A narrative synthesis will systematically review and synthesize the collected literature to produce and explain a broad conclusion of the selected literature. Lastly, a consultation exercise in the form of qualitative interviews will be conducted to assess the thematic analysis results and validate the result of this scoping review. This scoping review will require Institutional Review Board approval for the expert consultation in the form of qualitative interviews. Consultants’ identifying information will remain confidential. The collected and analyzed data from this scoping review will identify gaps in the literature to create an evidence-informed protocol for the management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage of the abdomen in civilian and military austere/remote environments. The results of this scoping review will be distributed in peer-reviewed journals and educational, medical presentations. Scoping Review Protocol, Level IV.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage of the abdomen in civilian and military austere/remote environments: protocol for a scoping review

Adams

McDonald

Sullo

et al. 2021

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Questions from Round 0 were compiled by the investigator team and loaded into Surveylet for Round 1, during which participants were asked to rate the priority of each research question on a 9-point Likert scale (1, low priority; 9, high priority). In Rounds 2 and 3, participants received numerical and graphical feedback based on the aggregated responses of other survey participants and could change their ratings in an effort to reach consensus regarding each question's priority as low, 1–3 medium, 4–6 or high 7–9 . Questions that reached consensus, defined as 60% agreement, were removed from subsequent rounds.…”

Section: Internet-based Delphi Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the Pediatric Research Gap Delphi Survey

Groner

Phuong²,

Price³

et al. 2022

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND:In 2016, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine trauma report recommended a National Trauma Research Action Plan to "strengthen trauma research and ensure that the resources available for this research are commensurate with the importance of injury and the potential for improvement in patient outcomes." With a contract from the Department of Defense, the Coalition for National Trauma Research created 11 expert panels to address this recommendation, with the goal of developing a comprehensive research agenda, spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. This report outlines the work of the group focused on pediatric trauma. METHODS:Experts in pediatric trauma clinical care and research were recruited to identify gaps in current clinical pediatric trauma research, generate research questions, and establish the priority of these questions using a consensus-driven Delphi survey approach. Using successive surveys, participants were asked to rank the priority of each research question on a 9-point Likert scale categorized to represent priority. Consensus was defined as >60% agreement within the priority category. Priority questions were coded based on a dictionary of 118 National Trauma Research Action Plan taxonomy concepts in 9 categories to support comparative analysis across all panels. RESULTS:Thirty-seven subject matter experts generated 625 questions. A total of 493 questions (79%) reached consensus on priority level. Of those reaching consensus, 159 (32%) were high, 325 (66%) were medium, and 9 (2%) were low priority. The highest priority research questions related to surgical interventions for traumatic brain injury (intracranial pressure monitoring and craniotomy); the second highest priority was hemorrhagic shock. The prehospital setting was the highest priority phase of care. CONCLUSION:This diverse panel of experts determined that most significant pediatric trauma research gaps were in traumatic brain injury, hemorrhagic shock, and the prehospital phase of care. These research domains should be top priorities for funding agencies.

show abstract

“…Reducing violence-related intentional injury requires a multifaceted, integrated public health approach. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Beginning 4 years ago, we implemented a firearm injury prevention strategy by leveraging 3 guiding principles: a commitment to approach firearm violence as a public health problem, not a political problem; evaluation of evidence for violence prevention programs, particularly those that could be implemented through a network of trauma centers; and a commitment to create a forum for a civil, collegial, and professional dialogue centered on reducing death and suffering.…”

Section: The American College Of Surgeons Committee On Trauma Public mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Over the past 4 years, we have evaluated and published our firearm injury prevention strategies, surveys of surgeons' views, and implementation strategies for a national trauma action plan. [3][4][5] Moreover, we have convened national town hall meetings, and met with stakeholder groups across the spectrum of views to calibrate potential policy development opportunities for firearm injury prevention. We have learned that a majority across the spectrum believe preventing firearm injury should be a high priority 4,7 ; that violence is a proximate cause of most firearm injuries, violence-related injury is more common than realized 1 ; therefore, violence intervention strategies are critical 6 ; and last, most agree on a wide-range of policies that balance personal freedom and responsibility.…”

Section: The American College Of Surgeons Committee On Trauma Public mentioning

confidence: 99%

Freedom with Responsibility: A Consensus Strategy for Preventing Injury, Death, and Disability from Firearm Violence

Stewart

Kuhls

Rotondo

et al. 2018

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Position statement of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma on the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine Report, A National Trauma Care System

Cited by 50 publications

References 1 publication

Management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage of the abdomen in civilian and military austere/remote environments: protocol for a scoping review

Management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage of the abdomen in civilian and military austere/remote environments: protocol for a scoping review

Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the Pediatric Research Gap Delphi Survey

Freedom with Responsibility: A Consensus Strategy for Preventing Injury, Death, and Disability from Firearm Violence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About