1991
DOI: 10.1109/70.86082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Position control of manipulator with passive joints using dynamic coupling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
88
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the inertia matrix, M(O), for realistic systems is at all times invertible. The relationship between joint accelerations and the end-effector acceleration is given by JI/ + j(j = i (5) which is obtained by differentiating (1). Now since we are concerned with analyzing the failure tolerant properties of manipulator configurations, the manipulator can be considered to be at rest so that d will be zero.…”
Section: Kinematic and Dynamic Dexteritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well known that the inertia matrix, M(O), for realistic systems is at all times invertible. The relationship between joint accelerations and the end-effector acceleration is given by JI/ + j(j = i (5) which is obtained by differentiating (1). Now since we are concerned with analyzing the failure tolerant properties of manipulator configurations, the manipulator can be considered to be at rest so that d will be zero.…”
Section: Kinematic and Dynamic Dexteritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of robotic manipulators in remote and/or hazardous environments greatly increases the cost and in some cases eliminates the possibility of repairing failed actuators [1][2][3]. For this reason kinematically redundant manipulators have been proposed for these applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is wellknown, using mathematical model, any parameter can be neglected, in this case the friction in the joints, which is a major drawback using the mathematical model approach. Trying to overcome that problem, some researchers have implemented additional equipments such as breaks at the passive joint [9][10][11][12]. In this case, the brake can generate torque; that means, after all, that kind of system is considered some kind of actuator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of under-actuated robots, this condition is not satisfied, which makes the behaviour of that class of robots very difficult to be predicted. Under-actuated robots can be a better design choice for robots in space and other industrial applications, and their advantages over fully actuated robots led to many studies to predict their behaviour [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. As a first advantage, a light-weight and low power consumption manipulator can be made.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These robots are inherently nonlinear and nonholonomic, and some researchers have been working on their control considering the nonholonomic constraints [5], [6]. We, however, intend to study the control problem by assuming that all passive joints are equipped with brakes [1]. This allows us to constrain the robot to be holonomic at every instant, and to use classical robot control techniques in this new class of mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%