1994
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7906(94)90021-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dexterity optimization of kinematically redundant manipulators in the presence of joint failures

Abstract: Abstract-Robotic manipulators working in remote or hazardous environments require additional measures to ensure their usability upon the failure of an actuator. This work considers failure modes that result in an immobilized joint and uses the concept of worst-case dexterity to define kinematic and dynamic fault tolerance measures for redundant manipulators. These measures are then used to specify the operating configuration which is optimal in the sense that the manipulator's dexterity remains high even if on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm consists of three main parts. In the first part, the inverse kinematics equation of single redundancy manipulator based on selfmotion variable and null-space velocity array of Jacobian 02015-p. 4 are analyzed and the group of joint space configurations which satisfies the request of end-effector trajectory tracking can be obtained by choosing different selfmotion variables. In the second part the mathematical description of fault tolerance criteria of the configuration for redundant manipulator is established and considering the joint limits and minimum the energy consumption the secondary optimization target is established in the third part.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The algorithm consists of three main parts. In the first part, the inverse kinematics equation of single redundancy manipulator based on selfmotion variable and null-space velocity array of Jacobian 02015-p. 4 are analyzed and the group of joint space configurations which satisfies the request of end-effector trajectory tracking can be obtained by choosing different selfmotion variables. In the second part the mathematical description of fault tolerance criteria of the configuration for redundant manipulator is established and considering the joint limits and minimum the energy consumption the secondary optimization target is established in the third part.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The redundancy feature of manipulators makes its joint configuration move free in a certain rules without changing the posture of end-effector and this process is called self-motion, which provides the possibility for the global trajectory optimization [3] This idea was first proposed in [4], where the null-space component of a redundant manipulator was used to locally minimize the kinematic fault tolerance measure. However, due to the local nature of the fault tolerance measure, fault tolerance could not be guaranteed globally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider a manipulator at a nonsingular configuration, driven by a generalized inverse control (10) where G=w-1f(Jw-1JT)-1 for some symmetric W>O.5 Let S be the set of the indices of the k locked joints, and let ji and Wi denote the ith columns ofJand W, respectively. Then, 1. Only the failed joints are commanded motion if and only if the commanded end-effector velocity vector Xc lies in the space spanned by the columns corresponding to the failed joints of the Jacobian, i.e., for some a; E IR, i E S, where e, represents a natural basis vector.…”
Section: Characterizing Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure tolerant control scheme would then try to optimize this value to maximize a robot's tolerance to a failure at a given manipulator configuration. Types of failure modes considered include both lockedjoint [31], [16], [32] and free-swinging joint failures [33]. A real-time implementation of kinematic failure tolerant control is demonstrated in [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%