2012
DOI: 10.1115/1.4005436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Position Control of a Rehabilitation Robotic Joint Based on Neuron Proportion-Integral and Feedforward Control

Abstract: The joint of the upper limb rehabilitation robot, which is designed and built in our lab, is driven by pneumatic muscles (PMs) in an opposing pair configuration. Each PM drives the robotic joint through a steel wire with a flexible sleeve and a tension device, which causes delay and various frictions as disturbances to the robotic joint system. These factors make the rehabilitation robotic joint very complex to model and control. Especially in position control, the overshoot is difficult to deal with when the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During experiment, the experimenter was instructed to grasp the robot end-effector with his/her right hand and, moreover, intentionally apply interaction forces with certain range to adjust the training path during trajectory tracking process. The results of the experiment conducted by S1 are shown in Figs (27) where i (t) denotes the ith resultant interaction force data.…”
Section: B Impedance-based Trajectory Tracking Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During experiment, the experimenter was instructed to grasp the robot end-effector with his/her right hand and, moreover, intentionally apply interaction forces with certain range to adjust the training path during trajectory tracking process. The results of the experiment conducted by S1 are shown in Figs (27) where i (t) denotes the ith resultant interaction force data.…”
Section: B Impedance-based Trajectory Tracking Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the existing rehabilitation control schemes can be classified into two types according to the participation degree of patients, i.e., the passive training control strategies [19]- [21] for the patients at the acute period to passively conduct repetitive movement tasks along predefined trajectory, and the cooperative training control strategies [22]- [26] for the patients at the recovery period to be actively engaged in the therapy training program. In [27], a passive training control approach combined with neuron proportion-integral and feedforward compensation control was developed to reduce the trajectory tracking error of a pneumatic muscles-driven rehabilitation robot. In [28], an enhanced neural-network-based repetitive learning controller was proposed for a lower limb exoskeleton to improve control accuracy and human safety during trajectory tracking training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control of the human–robot interaction system is a great challenge due to its highly nonlinear characteristics. Many control algorithms have been proposed to enhance the tracking accuracy of passive training, such as the robust adaptive neural controller ( 29 ), fuzzy adaptive backstepping controller ( 30 ), neural proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controller ( 31 ), fuzzy sliding mode controller ( 32 ), and neuron PI controller ( 33 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is a challenge to guarantee the position control accuracy during rehabilitation training due to the highly nonlinear properties and unexpected uncertainties of human-robot interaction. Different kinds of control algorithms have been developed to improve control performance of patient-passive training, including neural proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control [ 23 ], neural proportional-integral (PI) control [ 24 ], adaptive nonsingular terminal sliding mode control (SMC) [ 25 ], disturbance observer-based fuzzy control [ 26 ], neural-fuzzy adaptive control [ 27 ], adaptive backlash compensation control [ 28 ], and so on. Comparatively, the patient-cooperation training is applicable for the patients at the comparative recovery period, who have regained parts of motor functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%