Pos0287 a Phase Iii, Randomised, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare Bat1806/Biib800, a Proposed Tocilizumab Biosimilar, With Tocilizumab Reference Product in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis With an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate Therapy

Abstract

BackgroundBAT1806/BIIB800 is a proposed biosimilar to reference tocilizumab (TCZ). A Phase III randomised, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial was conducted as part of a biosimilar development programme.ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and immunogenicity of BAT1806/BIIB800 in comparison with EU-sourced TCZ in subjects with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX).MethodsThe study was conducted at 55 centres in China and Europe, between June 2018 and January 2021. Eligible subjects were randomised in a 2:1:1 ratio to one of three treatment groups: (1) BAT1806/BIIB800 up to Week 48, (2) TCZ up to Week 48, or (3) TCZ up to Week 24, followed by BAT1806/BIIB800 from Week 24 to Week 48, administered intravenously every 4 weeks at a dose of 8mg/kg. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects achieving an ACR20 response at timepoints pre-specified to meet the requirements of different Regulatory Agencies: Week 12, for EMA; Week 24, for FDA and NMPA. Equivalence margins applied to differences in ACR20 response rates in the BAT1806/BIIB800 and TCZ treatment groups were pre-specified as follows: +/- 14.5% for EMA (95% confidence interval (CI)); -12.0%,15% for FDA (90% CI); +/- 13.6% for NMPA (95% CI). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity.The ICH E9(R1) estimands framework including intercurrent events (related or unrelated to the COVID19 pandemic) was implemented for the ACR20 evaluation. A logistic regression model including ‘region’ (China and Eastern Europe) and ‘previous biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD use’ (Yes/No) as captured in Interactive Web Response System as stratification factors was utilised to assess equivalence for the primary endpoint. The difference in response rates was estimated and corresponding confidence intervals were derived to assess equivalence for the primary endpoint. This abstract presents results up to Week 24.ResultsIn total, 621 subjects were randomised to receive BAT1806/BIIB800 (N=312), TCZ (N=155), or TCZ followed by BAT1806/BIIB800 (N=154). The groups were comparable in terms of baseline demographics and disease characteristics, including age, gender, disease activity and disease duration. The estimated proportions of subjects achieving an ACR20 response in the BAT1806/BIIB800 vs. the TCZ groups, respectively, were 68.97% vs. 64.82% at Week 12 and 69.89% vs. 67.94% at Week 24. The estimated difference between ACR response rates was 4.15% (95% CI -3.63, 11.93) at week 12, and 1.94% (90% CI -4.04, 7.92; 95% CI -5.18, 9.07) at Week 24. The CIs for the estimated differences between the treatment groups were within the pre-defined equivalence margins (Figure 1). The treatment groups were comparable in terms of serum trough levels, incidence of TEAEs and ADA/NAb positivity (Table 1).Table 1.Safety and Immunogenicity up to Week 24, and Pharmacokinetics at Week 24TCZ (N =309) n (%)BAT1806/BIIB800 (N=312) n (%)TEAE196 (63.4)201 (64.4)Related TEAE151 (48.9)148 (47.4)Serious TEAE13 (4.2)11 (3.5)Related Serious TEAE7 (2.3)2 (0.6)Fatal TEAE1 (0.3)3 (1.0)ADA positive a42 (13.6%)64 (20.5%)NAb positive a42 (13.6%)63 (20.2%)PK, n271276Serum trough level (ug/mL), mean (SD)15.4 (17.1)15.8 (12.3)Serum trough level (ug/mL), geometric mean (CV%)12.3 (140.3)12.9 (121.3)Below limit of quantification, n (%)43 (15.9)28 (10.1)TEAE, treatment emergent adverse eventsa subjects with ≥1 ADA/NAb positive results up to week 24ConclusionBAT1806/BIIB800 has demonstrated equivalent efficacy at Week 12 and Week 24 and a similar PK, safety and immunogenicity profile as reference tocilizumab up to Week 24.Disclosure of InterestsXiaomei Leng: None declared, Piotr Leszczynski: None declared, Sławomir Jeka: None declared, Shengyun Liu: None declared, Huaxiang Liu: None declared, Malgorzata Miakisz: None declared, Jieruo Gu: None declared, Lali Kilasonia Speakers bureau: Sandoz, Amgen, Takeda, Mykola Stanislavchuk Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Orion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Xiaolei Yang Shareholder of: Employee of the Bio-thera Solutions Ltd. with shares as a part of Stock incentive plan., Employee of: Employee of the Bio-thera Solutions Ltd., Yinbo Zhou Shareholder of: Employee of Bio-thera Solutions Ltd. with share as part of Stock incentive plan, Employee of: Employee of Bio-thera Solutions Ltd., Qingfeng Dong Shareholder of: Employee of Bio-thera Solutions Ltd. with shares as part of Stock incentive plan, Employee of: Employee of Bio-thera Solutions Ltd., Marian Mitroiu Shareholder of: Employee of Biogen and may hold stocks, Employee of: Employee of Biogen, Janet Addison Shareholder of: Employee of Biogen and holds stock in Biogen, Employee of: Employee of Biogen, Xiaofeng Zeng: None declared

Targeting IL-6 or IL-6 Receptor in Rheumatoid Arthritis: What Have We Learned?

“…The results of the phase III study BAT1806/BIIB800 in patients with RA with moderate-to-severe disease activity and irresponsive to MTX were published at the EULAR Congress in 2022 [ 53 ]. With a randomization of 2:1:1, patients were divided into three groups: (1) those who received BAT1806/BIIB800 for 48 weeks; (2) those who received TCZ for 48 weeks; or (3) those who received TCZ for 24 weeks followed by BAT1806/BIIB800 for the next 24 weeks.…”