2017
DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.198342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portsmouth physiological and operative severity score for the Enumeration of Mortality and morbidity scoring system in general surgical practice and identifying risk factors for poor outcome

Abstract: Background:Estimation of the outcome is paramount in disease stratification and subsequent management in severely ill surgical patients. Risk scoring helps us quantify the prospects of adverse outcome in a patient. Portsmouth-Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (P-POSSUM) the world over has proved itself as a worthy scoring system and the present study was done to evaluate the feasibility of P-POSSUM as a risk scoring system as a tool in efficacious predict… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to these scores, PIRATE is based on a Cox regression model that accounts for the characteristics of the survival and censoring processes during the post-interventional 30-day period [ 5 7 ]. Further, compared to other scores, we solely included readily available pre -interventional predictors, focussing on a quick and easy risk assessment before intervention [ 6 , 7 ]. Similar to POSPOM, we derived a user-friendly scoring system that is applicable in daily clinical routine [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to these scores, PIRATE is based on a Cox regression model that accounts for the characteristics of the survival and censoring processes during the post-interventional 30-day period [ 5 7 ]. Further, compared to other scores, we solely included readily available pre -interventional predictors, focussing on a quick and easy risk assessment before intervention [ 6 , 7 ]. Similar to POSPOM, we derived a user-friendly scoring system that is applicable in daily clinical routine [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…POSSUM, P-POSSUM, POSPOM) used a logistic regression model with a binary outcome (dead vs. alive) for score development not accounting for censoring. In contrast to these scores, PIRATE is based on a Cox regression model that accounts for the characteristics of the survival and censoring processes during the post-interventional 30-day period [5][6][7]. Further, compared to other scores, we solely included readily available pre-interventional predictors, focussing on a quick and easy risk assessment before intervention [6,7].…”
Section: Comparison To Existing Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a prospective study on fifty subjects undergoing major general surgeries, the validity of P-POSSUM was assessed and it was observed that this score is a reliable predictor for determining the quality of care given to a patient to avoid post-operative complications that might lead to increased morbidity and mortality. [ 23 ]…”
Section: Methods Of Pre-anaesthetic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A P-POSSUM score was also calculated and recorded to determine the operative risk for each subject. 22 The Edmonton frail scale was also recorded. 23 (The detailed description regarding P-POSSUM score and Edmonton frail scale are available in the supplemental digital content 1 and 2).…”
Section: Aterials and M Ethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%