2021
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2021.705475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portland Versus Alkaline Cement: Continuity or Clean Break: “A Key Decision for Global Sustainability”

Abstract: This review undertakes rigorous analysis of much of the copious literature available to the scientific community on the use of alkali-activated binders (AABs) in construction. The authors’ main intention is to categorically refute arguments of that part of the scientific community underestimating or even dismissing the actual potential of AABs as alternatives to Portland cement (PC). The main premise invoked in support of those arguments is a presumed lack of material resources for precursors that would make A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 219 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of that consumption, 67,000 million tons are transformed into atmospheric pollution, such as carbon dioxide, or become solid waste, such as the plastics that enter the oceans each year. Of the remaining 35,000 million tons, only 8400 million tons are reused [1,2]. The construction materials manufacturing industry, notably the concrete sector, is having difficulty meeting market demand due to the scarcity of limestone of higher quality [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of that consumption, 67,000 million tons are transformed into atmospheric pollution, such as carbon dioxide, or become solid waste, such as the plastics that enter the oceans each year. Of the remaining 35,000 million tons, only 8400 million tons are reused [1,2]. The construction materials manufacturing industry, notably the concrete sector, is having difficulty meeting market demand due to the scarcity of limestone of higher quality [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geopolymer binder is recognized as a viable alternative to cementitious material because of its inherent merits of low embodied energy and lower carbon emission into the environment [6]. Geopolymer concrete (GPC) is formulated by the activation of industrial by-products containing supplementary cementitious materials with alkaline activators [2,7]. GPC applicability is mainly confined to off-site precast and modular construction because of its curing needs and safety concerns over exposure of untrained employees to alkaline activators [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most promising alternatives is alkali-activated materials (AAM) ( Rivera et al, 2021 ; van Deventer et al, 2021 ), also referred to as geopolymers. The terms geopolymers ( Davidovits, 1989 ), inorganic polymers ( Van Wazer, 1970 ), alkali-activated cement ( Palomo and López de la Fuente, 2003 ), and geocement ( Krivenko, 1994 ) are all used to describe these binding materials, which can provide comparable, or higher performance than the traditional cementitious binders ( Wang et al, 2019 ; Alzeer et al, 2021 ) with significantly lower greenhouse emissions ( Gartner, 2004 ; Palomo et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To transform the portland cement manufacturing industry into an AAB factory did not require a huge investment for the large scale production of AABs. Therefore, in the current circumstances it is required to explore the standardization formulas for the commercial development of AABs in the construction sector [ 24 ]. It has been observed from the Feret equation that a significant amount of cement is needed to achieve the same compressive strength as that of the alkali-activated concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%