Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2021.1908637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Port connectivity and competition among container ports in Southeast Asia based on Social Network Analysis and TOPSIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher the importance ranking of the nodes based on their own attributes, the higher the importance ranking of the nodes based on global attributes. For example, the ports of Singapore (1,1), Rotterdam (2,2), Algeciras (4,6), Klang (5,3), Piraeus (8,4), Busan (9,8) and Ningbo (10,10), all of which have high centrality indicators and large number of ports with which they have an effective path and a large value of information transfer, have resulted in high results for both importance calculations [9].…”
Section: 3correlation Analysis Of Calculated Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher the importance ranking of the nodes based on their own attributes, the higher the importance ranking of the nodes based on global attributes. For example, the ports of Singapore (1,1), Rotterdam (2,2), Algeciras (4,6), Klang (5,3), Piraeus (8,4), Busan (9,8) and Ningbo (10,10), all of which have high centrality indicators and large number of ports with which they have an effective path and a large value of information transfer, have resulted in high results for both importance calculations [9].…”
Section: 3correlation Analysis Of Calculated Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows that the thickness of the route distinguishes the size of the number of sailings of a single transport route, and the radius of the port node distinguishes the size of the sum of the number of sailings passing through the port. The ports of Singapore, Shanghai, Ningbo, Hong Kong and Port Klang are the ports with the highest number of sailings, indicating that these ports have a high status in the maritime network; Shanghai-Ningbo and Port Klang-Singapore are the routes with the highest frequency of sailings, indicating that these two routes are the key routes in the network, and an accident at the port of origin and destination of the route will have a great impact on the network [4].…”
Section: 2spatial Layout Of the Container Shipping Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim [9] compared the port competitiveness of China and South Korea through TOPSIS evaluation. Nguyen and Woo [10] used the TOPSIS method and K-mean cluster analysis to evaluate the competitiveness of Southeast Asian container ports. Md Hanafah et al [11] used AHP and TOPSIS techniques to control maritime accidents at the Strait of Malacca.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, combining the different transportation methods allow the port to connect the producer and the consumer through import or export activities (Pettit and Beresford, 2009). Ports being on the global maritime shipping routes can gain certain benefits, such as connecting easily to ports in different areas, attracting more ship calls and improving cargo volumes, gaining more information, having more authority, and having a significant influence over other ports (Nguyen and Woo, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%