2009
DOI: 10.1159/000235852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porous Acellular Porcine Dermal Collagen Implants to Repair Fascial Defects in a Rat Model: Biomechanical Evaluation up to 180 Days

Abstract: Aim: To investigate the biomechanical properties of porous collagen matrices in a rat abdominal wall defect model. Study Design: 112 rats were implanted with non-cross-linked InteXèn LP, cross-linked Pelvicol, and two investigational acellular collagen matrices (ACMs) sterilized either with ethylene oxide (ACM ETO) or γ-irradiation (ACM GI). After 14, 30, 90 and 180 days, 7 animals per group were sacrificed to document adhesions, herniation, infection, stress resistance and histology. Results: The 2 sterilizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, Jenkins et al reported a 50 % area reduction and wrinkling for abdominal wall reconstruction after 3 months in mini pigs using Collamend (another cross-linked porcine dermis; Bard, Davol, RI) [ 38 ]. They explained the process by the presence of encapsulation, though we observed that process also in non-contracted ACM [ 37 ]. Contraction is, however, not the privilege of ACM, as significant contraction rates have been reported following PP implantation both in the vagina (45 %) and abdomen (10 %) 90 days after surgery [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, Jenkins et al reported a 50 % area reduction and wrinkling for abdominal wall reconstruction after 3 months in mini pigs using Collamend (another cross-linked porcine dermis; Bard, Davol, RI) [ 38 ]. They explained the process by the presence of encapsulation, though we observed that process also in non-contracted ACM [ 37 ]. Contraction is, however, not the privilege of ACM, as significant contraction rates have been reported following PP implantation both in the vagina (45 %) and abdomen (10 %) 90 days after surgery [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Studies on abdominal insertion showed various results. Ozog et al reported minimal or unchanged dimensions in 180 days with Pelvicol in rats, however, without visible deformation [ 37 ]. Conversely, Jenkins et al reported a 50 % area reduction and wrinkling for abdominal wall reconstruction after 3 months in mini pigs using Collamend (another cross-linked porcine dermis; Bard, Davol, RI) [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noncross-linked SIS prosthesis examined here appeared highly degraded 180 days after implant, in agreement with the absence of SIS used to repair abdominal wall defects in dogs observed after 4 months. 18 Other authors 19 have recently tested the use of a similar prosthesis (InteXen LP, American Medical Systems, Inc, Minnetonka, MN) to repair fascial defects in a rat model. These authors described remodeling of the implant site by 180 days without compromising stress resistance and also noted the greater tensiometric strength of noncross-linked prostheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal studies have explained this phenomenon and shown that in certain individuals Pelvicol is rapidly degraded. 58 TVT and PVS had equivalent success, but PVS required a longer hospital stay and more patients required short-term self-catheterization. Unfortunately no RCTs have been performed comparing the PVS to midurethral slings in the treatment of ISD which is the primary indication for a PVS in the current treatment of SUI.…”
Section: Dovepressmentioning
confidence: 89%