2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00107-010-0504-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porosity and pore size distribution of different wood types as determined by mercury intrusion porosimetry

Abstract: In this work, densities and porosity parameters are determined on domestic and overseas soft-and hardwoods by application of pycnometric methods and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Great variability was found in bulk density, porosity and in the specific surface area. According to the pore size distribution, four pore size classes could be distinguished: macropores (radius 58-2 µm and 2-0.5 µm), mesopores (500-80 nm), and micropores (80-1.8 nm). The pore size distribution can vary even in the case of comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
143
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
12
143
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This result contradicts the findings of Zauer et al (2013) who observed lower cell wall density in softwood than in hardwood. In a recent study, Plötze and Niemz (2011) obtained an average value of 1493 kg m −3 with a minimum of 1458 kg m −3 for Nauclea diderrichii and a maximum of 1528 kg m −3 for Q. robur. The value for F. sylvatica is 1472 kg m −3 .…”
Section: Advantages and Drawbacks Of The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This result contradicts the findings of Zauer et al (2013) who observed lower cell wall density in softwood than in hardwood. In a recent study, Plötze and Niemz (2011) obtained an average value of 1493 kg m −3 with a minimum of 1458 kg m −3 for Nauclea diderrichii and a maximum of 1528 kg m −3 for Q. robur. The value for F. sylvatica is 1472 kg m −3 .…”
Section: Advantages and Drawbacks Of The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Techniques for measuring the porosity of wood include MIP (Schneider 1982(Schneider , 1983Ding et al 2008, Plötze andNiemz 2011) and gas adsorption isotherms or solute exclusion (Berthold and Salmen 1997), as well as thermo-porosimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance (Furo and Daicic 1999), and small-angle X-ray scattering (Jakob et al 1996). The MIP method can be used to measure macro-and mesopores in the range of 1.8 nm to 58 µm (Plötze and Niemz 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although total intrusion volume, pore area, and average pore diameter values also changed, the bulk densities of the control samples and sapwood samples after enzymatic treatment were almost the same. Pore radii were classified into three groups: r< 0.1 µm (microvoids), 0.1 to 5 µm (small tracheid gaps), 0.1 to 0.7 µm (diameter of margo capillaries), and r>5 µm (lumen radii) (Schneider 1979;Plotze and Niemz 2011;He et al 2014). Figures 2 and 3 reveal a clear increase in porosity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%