2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.03.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porogen formulations for obtaining molecularly imprinted polymers with optimized binding properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of the crowding agent on the enhanced affinity may be related to the increased hydrophobicity of the microenvironment [29][30][31][32][33]. However, the polymers made with the mixture of chloroform and PS were too soft to be used for the HPLC column.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The effect of the crowding agent on the enhanced affinity may be related to the increased hydrophobicity of the microenvironment [29][30][31][32][33]. However, the polymers made with the mixture of chloroform and PS were too soft to be used for the HPLC column.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2a-f, the thickness and surface morphology of each MIP layer are quite variable for different templates despite the fact that the same preparation protocol was employed for all the MIP columns. It is well known that the surface morphology and molecular recognition capability of MIP are affected by choice of porogenic solvent [22][23][24]. It is also known that not only porogenic solvent but also template molecule plays an important role in determining the surface morphology [20,25,26].…”
Section: Morphological Architecture Of Ot-mip Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This had already been shown in earlier reports on thin MIP structures. [4,16] The size, density, and distribution of the pores are clearly similar on the MIP and the NIP. The pore sizes range from 200 to 400 nm in diameter, with a few pores of 100 nm in diameter; the values confirm the comparable physical morphologies of the 2,4-D imprinted polymer and the nonimprinted control.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%