2009
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/20/204012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore size distribution and supercritical hydrogen adsorption in activated carbon fibers

Abstract: Pore size distributions (PSD) and supercritical H 2 isotherms have been measured for two activated carbon fiber (ACF) samples. The surface area and the PSD both depend on the degree of activation to which the ACF has been exposed. The low-surface-area ACF has a narrow PSD centered at 0.5 nm, while the high-surface-area ACF has a broad distribution of pore widths between 0.5 and 2 nm. The H 2 adsorption enthalpy in the zero-coverage limit depends on the relative abundance of the smallest pores relative to the l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pore-size distribution (left) and relative filling (right) of CNS-201 (black), MSC-30 (red), ZTC "P7(2)-H" (blue), and ZTC-3 (purple), calculated by the NLDFT method. 4,5,9,10 It has been proposed that 1.14 nm is the optimal spacing between graphene layers for maximum adsorption uptake of methane. 11,12 The pore-size distribution of ZTC-3 has a mean pore-width close to this value, shown as a gray line in Figure S1.…”
Section: Dft Pore-size Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pore-size distribution (left) and relative filling (right) of CNS-201 (black), MSC-30 (red), ZTC "P7(2)-H" (blue), and ZTC-3 (purple), calculated by the NLDFT method. 4,5,9,10 It has been proposed that 1.14 nm is the optimal spacing between graphene layers for maximum adsorption uptake of methane. 11,12 The pore-size distribution of ZTC-3 has a mean pore-width close to this value, shown as a gray line in Figure S1.…”
Section: Dft Pore-size Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,13,14 The apparatus was equipped with a digital cold cathode pressure sensor (I-MAG, Series 423), a highresolution pressure manometer (MKS Baratron, Model 120AA), a high pressure manometer (MKS Baratron, Model 833), and a molecular drag pump to achieve a measurable pressure range of 10 -5 to 10 7 Pa. Temperature was measured on the wall of the manifold and on the outer wall of the sample holder using K-type thermocouples and platinum resistance thermometers (PRTs).…”
Section: Methane Adsorption Measurements and Cyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results, it is concluded that the actual order of the hydrogen storage capacity is highly, as is that of the micropore volume. It is suggested that the microporous cavities on the MWNT surfaces offer an attraction force for hydrogen molecules [37]. Therefore, the hydrogen storage capacity of the Pt-loaded activated MWNTs, under common operating conditions (298 K/100 bar), can be attributed to the micropore that exists within favorable sites in the defective surface.…”
Section: Hydrogen Uptake Capacitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…metal-hydrogen sulfide reaction. (Xiao, Wang et al 2008) 2 Representative value based on distributed range (Cao, Wang et al 2002;Purewal, Kabbour et al 2009) The zinc concentration of ORM TM was also higher than the zinc concentration of TDRP TM . This difference may be another reason for the difference in adsorption capacities.…”
Section: Figure 7 Breakthrough Capacity Of Orm Tm and Tdrp Tmmentioning
confidence: 99%