2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore-scale contact angle measurements at reservoir conditions using X-ray microtomography

Abstract: 21.11.14 KB. OK to add published version, OA pape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
212
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
212
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 shows the average and standard deviation of all contact angles (RCA, ACA, and SCA) measured in this study. These results show that SCA, RCA, and ACA have high discrepancies at each pore throat size, consistent with previous studies [38,40,47]. Contact angles measured using micro-CT with rock cores and beads packs also have a wide range of values due to hysteresis of contact angle, exposure time, complex geometry, and physical and chemical heterogeneity of the surface [38,40,47].…”
Section: Comparing Different Types Of Contact Anglesupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 7 shows the average and standard deviation of all contact angles (RCA, ACA, and SCA) measured in this study. These results show that SCA, RCA, and ACA have high discrepancies at each pore throat size, consistent with previous studies [38,40,47]. Contact angles measured using micro-CT with rock cores and beads packs also have a wide range of values due to hysteresis of contact angle, exposure time, complex geometry, and physical and chemical heterogeneity of the surface [38,40,47].…”
Section: Comparing Different Types Of Contact Anglesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Thus, static contact angles have been measured with rocks, sand packs, and glass bids, showing a wide range of contact angles at pore level. The wide range of static contact angles are due to the following: (1) pore topology, hysteresis, surface chemical and physical heterogeneity, and injection patterns (i.e., drainage and imbibition) [9,30,33,[38][39][40]; (2) relaxation of contact angle [30]; and (3) low resolution of images. Thus, Scanziani et al [9] have proposed an "effective contact angle" measurement using fluid-fluid interface curvature instead of "true contact angle" at the contact line of fluids and rock surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another option is to work with porous media that do not contain any organic matter. For example, Brusseau et al [10] and Culligan et al [12] show air-water interfaces in 3D computed 2 tomography (CT) images of repacked sand and glass beads, respectively, at a resolution of about 12 ”m using synchrotron X-ray CT. More recently, Andrew et al [4] show detailed air-water interfaces and are able to successfully measure contact angle of CO 2 -brine interfaces onto the solid surface of limestone at a small resolution of 2 ”m. Working with a real soil material, Carminati et al [11] adopt yet another approach, in that they focus on the water that occupies part of the volume in larger pores, located between aggregates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-ray micro-computed tomography (”-CT) multiphase flow experiments are aimed at imaging the in situ fluid phase distributions in porous media (Wildenschild et al 2005;Silin et al 2010;Iglauer et al 2011;Setiavan et al 2012;Andrew et al 2014). Recently, fast synchrotron-based ”-CT has been used to image fluid distributions under dynamic conditions (Berg et al 2013b); the term "dynamic" means that fluid flow is maintained while imaging, with ms integration times thus enabling dynamic process studies on basis of a series of images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%