2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2014.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore characteristics of Wilcox Group Coal, U.S. Gulf Coast Region: Implications for the occurrence of coalbed gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ash yields on an air-dried basis of the samples change greatly, ranging from 9.82 to 64.76%, with an average of 59.15% in the carbonaceous mudstones and 19.44% in the coals (Table ). As the pore and fracture in the samples can be partially filled with the ash dominated by various minerals, , ash yield is negatively correlated with porosity (Figure a). Furthermore, coals with high ash yields can effectively increase densities (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ash yields on an air-dried basis of the samples change greatly, ranging from 9.82 to 64.76%, with an average of 59.15% in the carbonaceous mudstones and 19.44% in the coals (Table ). As the pore and fracture in the samples can be partially filled with the ash dominated by various minerals, , ash yield is negatively correlated with porosity (Figure a). Furthermore, coals with high ash yields can effectively increase densities (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it can be concluded that the minimum variation in pore radius is 10 nm under this investigated condition. A huge volume of gas in coal is adsorbed on the surface of micropores and minipores (Liu et al, 2015a;Swanson et al, 2014). Thus, micropores and minipores are the main factors influencing coal adsorption capacity.…”
Section: Variation In Proportions Of Pore Characteristics With Varyinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors noted a strong positive relationship between coalbed gas content and micropore volume. Swanson et al (2014) reported that the micropore surface area and micropore volume played a crucial role in the gas-holding capacity of Louisiana coal, and that adsorption through micropores is the primary form of gas storage. Both coalbed gas content and initial gas desorption velocity were examined by Jiang et al (2011a), Xu et al (2014) and Zhang et al (2015) to analyse the variations in coal subjected to the sill intrusion and its implication for abnormal gas occurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated the complex porosity system in coal. It is primarily influenced by coal rank, depth, organic matter, mineral composition, moisture, and reservoir temperature–pressure conditions. The coal system possesses two different kinds of porosity: primary porosity, which is composed of meso- and micropores associated to the coal matrix, and secondary porosity, which is composed of fractures and cleats. Pores are classified into three types based on size: (a) micropore- with a diameter < 2 nm, (b) mesopore- with a diameter between 2 and 50 nm, and (c) macropore with a diameter > 50 nm (IUPAC classification). Other pore categorization techniques were published by Mays, but they were not well received for coal reservoirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%