2009
DOI: 10.1675/063.032.0106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Trends in Royal and Sandwich Terns Along the Mid-Atlantic Seaboard, USA, 1975–2005

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both Sooty and Angel Terns show extensive natal philopatry but lack genetic structure across a large geographic range [ 32 , 35 ]. Secondly, due to the preference for vegetation-sparse habitats during the breeding season, plant succession will lead to colony abandonment in Royal Terns [ 41 ]. Thus Royal Terns, like other seabirds, may show strong nesting fidelity over several years with occasional interruption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both Sooty and Angel Terns show extensive natal philopatry but lack genetic structure across a large geographic range [ 32 , 35 ]. Secondly, due to the preference for vegetation-sparse habitats during the breeding season, plant succession will lead to colony abandonment in Royal Terns [ 41 ]. Thus Royal Terns, like other seabirds, may show strong nesting fidelity over several years with occasional interruption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population genetic studies have not been undertaken on Royal terns, thus little is known of the degree of gene flow among populations [39]. Banding data in southern North Carolina [39,40] indicates high levels of breeding site fidelity, while nest and chick census data in North Carolina, Maryland and Virginia indicates a gradual decrease in recruitment since the 1980s followed by a recent increase during the early 21 st Century [41]. Little is known about demographic patterns outside of these states and the species is classified with moderate concern in the North American waterbird conservation plan [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROYT have been extensively banded on the breeding grounds in the mid-Atlantic region of North America as part of multiple research and monitoring activities (e.g., Buckley & Buckley, 1977;Emslie et al, 2009;Erwin, 1978; Chicks were initially marked through organized banding drives that occurred from late June through mid-July, in which researchers walked through the nesting colony and herded the creche of chicks into a previously constructed corral. Following capture, chicks large enough to retain a band, were fit with a standard issue U.S.…”
Section: Mark-recapture Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because climate change and commercial fishing both have the potential to independently alter predator-prey dynamics between seabirds and fish, a detailed understanding of each of these processes is important for seabird conservation (Barbraud et al, 2012) throughout the Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Pacific coasts of North America, with a non-breeding range that extends into the Caribbean and coastal South America (Buckley et al, 2021). Although not considered to be a species of conservation concern, regional ROYT populations throughout the United States have declined in abundance since the 1970s (Emslie et al, 2009;Foster et al, 2009;Jodice et al, 2007). Similar to many other seabirds, habitat degradation, reductions in food availability, and incidental take associated with fishing are considered likely drivers of regional population declines (Buckley et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all studies in the scientific literature deal with sites in the USA (Soots and Parnell 1975;Soots and Landin 1978;Melvin and Webb 1998;Delaney et al 2000;Shafer and Streever 2000;Zedler 2000;Erwin et al 2001;Perry et al 2001;Neckles et al 2002;Erwin et al 2003;Darnell and Smith 2004;Yozzo et al 2004;Guilfoyle et al 2007;Spear et al 2007;Golder et al 2008;Emslie et al 2009). However, very few studies exist for European countries, where these particular types of man-made sites are far less common and of very small size (ABP Southampton 1998; Atkinson et al 2001;de Jonge and de Jong 2002;Atkinson 2003;Bakker and Piersma 2006;Gallego Fernández and García 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%