2019
DOI: 10.7554/elife.47596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population response magnitude variation in inferotemporal cortex predicts image memorability

Abstract: Most accounts of image and object encoding in inferotemporal cortex (IT) focus on the distinct patterns of spikes that different images evoke across the IT population. By analyzing data collected from IT as monkeys performed a visual memory task, we demonstrate that variation in a complementary coding scheme, the magnitude of the population response, can largely account for how well images will be remembered. To investigate the origin of IT image memorability modulation, we probed convolutional neural network … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
44
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(50 reference statements)
9
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Right, Behavioral responses triggered by changes in optogenetic input reflect the integrated spike counts, as behavioral responses were always suppressed by reductions in spiking regardless of whether reductions were followed by rapid release from inhibition. (Jaegle et al, 2019). These results strongly support the idea that decoding by central visual structures depends on increases in spiking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Right, Behavioral responses triggered by changes in optogenetic input reflect the integrated spike counts, as behavioral responses were always suppressed by reductions in spiking regardless of whether reductions were followed by rapid release from inhibition. (Jaegle et al, 2019). These results strongly support the idea that decoding by central visual structures depends on increases in spiking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, the question of which stimulus properties are easier to remember has been rapidly growing in popularity in recent years. Studies that focused on the concept of intrinsic memorability have typically used a combination of visual factors to predict subsequent memory of scenes (Bainbridge et al, 2017;Isola et al, 2014), objects (Jaegle et al, 2019), and unfamiliar faces (Bainbridge et al, 2013). Very few such memorability studies have examined verbal stimuli, and the semantic factors examined in such studies are usually limited to category membership (Bainbridge & Rissman, 2018) or automatic labels generated by automated computer vision algorithms (Borkin et al, 2016;Isola et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to insights into the nature of these differences, this is of importance to the neuroscience community as different distance measures emphasize different aspects of the data that could be of specific interest in a given experimental setting. For example, the vector angle of neural population responses in IT was recently shown to encode different cognitive aspects than their magnitude 24 . This requires computational models to be probed in the same manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%