1993
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(199307)49:4<459::aid-jclp2270490402>3.0.co;2-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population recovery capabilities of 35 cluster analysis methods

Abstract: Comparative evaluation of population recovery capabilities of 35 cluster analysis methods defined by different combinations of 5 profile similarity measures and 7 agglomeration rules was undertaken using artificial data that represented duplicate mixture samples from 4 latent populations. The latent population mean profiles differed primarily in elevation or in 'pattern parameters. Latent population sampling variances were controlled to provide two different levels of realistic overlap. The within‐population d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This two-stage clustering procedure (hierarchical and non-hierarchical methods used in tandem) produced enhanced cluster recovery and were found to be robust with respect to different types of error (Milligan, 1980). In the hierarchical cluster analysis, we used Ward's minimum variance methods applied to squared Euclidean distance indices, because a simulation study suggested this combination to be superior (Overall et al 1993). We chose two stopping rules for determining the number of clusters.…”
Section: Group Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This two-stage clustering procedure (hierarchical and non-hierarchical methods used in tandem) produced enhanced cluster recovery and were found to be robust with respect to different types of error (Milligan, 1980). In the hierarchical cluster analysis, we used Ward's minimum variance methods applied to squared Euclidean distance indices, because a simulation study suggested this combination to be superior (Overall et al 1993). We chose two stopping rules for determining the number of clusters.…”
Section: Group Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the dissimilarity between any pair of students was defined in terms of the city-block metric (as the sum of the absolute differences between their scores on the six scales). Using artificial data sets, Overall, Gibson, and Novy (1993) found that complete linkage clustering and the city-block metric achieved better recovery of latent clusters than all other combinations of clustering methods and metrics.…”
Section: Conceptions Of Effective Tutoring 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ward's algorithm is a hierarchical agglomerative procedure that has been shown to be one of the better clustering methods in several simulation studies (Blashfield, 1976;Milligan, 1980;Milligan & Cooper, 1987;Milligan & Hirtle, 2003;Overall, Gibson, & Novy, 1993). Since hierarchical cluster analyses are generally sensitive to the input order of the data (e.g., Podani, 1997), we used the SPSS add-on PermuCLUSTER (van der Kloot, Spanns, & Heiser, 2005) to compare the cluster solutions obtained from 100 random permutations of the input order.…”
Section: Time Series-based Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%