2016
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010166.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population-level interventions in government jurisdictions for dietary sodium reduction

Abstract: Population-level interventions in government jurisdictions for dietary sodium reduction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
104
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
104
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Italy has established a programme to work with the food industry including legislation to limit the salt content of bread . England has been implementing a comprehensive government lead, salt reduction intervention including salt targets and working with industry to reformulate foods since 2006 . Canada has also established targets for packaged foods that contribute the most salt to the Canadian diet .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Italy has established a programme to work with the food industry including legislation to limit the salt content of bread . England has been implementing a comprehensive government lead, salt reduction intervention including salt targets and working with industry to reformulate foods since 2006 . Canada has also established targets for packaged foods that contribute the most salt to the Canadian diet .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool . Observational, nonrandomized studies were assessed using a modified Cochrane risk of bias tool . For meta‐analyses, the AMSTAR tool was applied .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluated studies were appraised for quality using a Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool,15 previously modified and used in the evaluation of randomised and non-randomised controlled trial studies of population-level sodium reduction 16. Two review authors independently scored studies low, unclear or high risk of bias across six domains: sampling; sample representativeness; reliability/validity of exposure and outcome measure; blinding of outcome assessment; risk of selective outcome reporting; and confounding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%