2016
DOI: 10.1111/jch.12874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Science of Salt: A Regularly Updated Systematic Review of Salt and Health Outcomes (August to November 2015)

Abstract: The purpose of this review was to systematically identify, summarize, and critically appraise studies on dietary salt relating to health outcomes that were published from August to November 2015. The search strategy was adapted from a previous systematic review on dietary salt and health. Overall, 15 studies were included in the review: one study assessed cardiovascular events, five studies assessed blood pressure or hypertension incidence, six studies assessed surrogate outcomes for cardiovascular or kidney d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A priority is to develop minimum methodologic standards for the conduct of validation studies. A regularly updated systematic review of the literature assessing the association of sodium intake to clinical outcomes found the majority of studies could not meet even minimum methodologic criteria . The initial TRUE consortium position on blood pressure measurement in research studies was also developed because few research studies used the recommended methods to assess blood pressure .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A priority is to develop minimum methodologic standards for the conduct of validation studies. A regularly updated systematic review of the literature assessing the association of sodium intake to clinical outcomes found the majority of studies could not meet even minimum methodologic criteria . The initial TRUE consortium position on blood pressure measurement in research studies was also developed because few research studies used the recommended methods to assess blood pressure .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A regularly updated systematic review of the literature assessing the association of sodium intake to clinical outcomes found the majority of studies could not meet even minimum methodologic criteria. [69][70][71][72][73][74] The initial TRUE consortium position on blood pressure measurement in research studies was also developed because few research studies used the recommended methods to assess blood pressure. 13 Institutions funding research, journals, and scientists need to carefully assess the validity of the methods used in research relating to dietary sodium to ensure reliable guidance to public health programs.…”
Section: Setting Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11] In addition, two annual systematic reviews incorporating studies published between 2013 and 2015 were published. 4,12 To date there have been five periodic systematic reviews published-three focused on evaluating the implementation of salt reduction strategies identified as part of the Science of Salt Weekly systematic review series, with a view to informing future implementation of interventions to lower population salt consumption, 7,8,11 and two summarizing the volume of studies reporting on the effects of salt intake on health outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,12 To date there have been five periodic systematic reviews published-three focused on evaluating the implementation of salt reduction strategies identified as part of the Science of Salt Weekly systematic review series, with a view to informing future implementation of interventions to lower population salt consumption, 7,8,11 and two summarizing the volume of studies reporting on the effects of salt intake on health outcomes. 9,10 The reviews evaluating intervention studies provide important recommendations for the implementation of salt reduction strategies including government commitment, the need for multicomponent interventions extending the focus beyond targeting consumer behavior, and using standardized methodologies to rigorously monitor the salt content of processed foods. Additionally, the need for greater emphasis on external validity, and an evaluation framework that supports both scientific robustness and external validity is highlighted as an important element in providing further evidence of effectiveness in real-world situations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of this initiative, regularly updated systematic reviews on the relationship between salt and health outcomes, and the implementation of salt reduction interventions are being published in the Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 16 To date, 11 studies (six on the relationship of salt and health outcomes [17][18][19][20][21][22] and five related to the implementation of salt reduction interventions [23][24][25][26][27] ) have been published. The last implementation review was the first to employ a thematic approach focusing on studies that reported knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors relating to salt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%