2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population dynamics of infectious diseases: A discrete time model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, determining wildlife disease dynamics including rates of infection, drivers of transmission, vector feeding preferences, and host mortality presents significant challenges (McCallum et al 2001, Wobeser 2008. The importance of these epizootiological parameters for understanding hostpathogen dynamics, population effects, and on host-pathogen evolution have long been recognized, but are infrequently addressed (Scott 1988, Oli et al 2006, Murray et al 2009, Lachish et al 2011a. Quantifying epizootiological parameters in wildlife populations is difficult because methods used in human epidemiology seldom apply (McCallum et al 2001, Caley and Hone 2004, Lachish et al 2011a; however, recent applications of multi-state mark-recapture models have provided an important tool to assess infection dynamics and population impacts (Faustino et al 2004, Senar and Conroy 2004, Conn and Cooch 2009, Atkinson and Samuel 2010 while accounting for differential capture heterogeneity (Jennelle et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, determining wildlife disease dynamics including rates of infection, drivers of transmission, vector feeding preferences, and host mortality presents significant challenges (McCallum et al 2001, Wobeser 2008. The importance of these epizootiological parameters for understanding hostpathogen dynamics, population effects, and on host-pathogen evolution have long been recognized, but are infrequently addressed (Scott 1988, Oli et al 2006, Murray et al 2009, Lachish et al 2011a. Quantifying epizootiological parameters in wildlife populations is difficult because methods used in human epidemiology seldom apply (McCallum et al 2001, Caley and Hone 2004, Lachish et al 2011a; however, recent applications of multi-state mark-recapture models have provided an important tool to assess infection dynamics and population impacts (Faustino et al 2004, Senar and Conroy 2004, Conn and Cooch 2009, Atkinson and Samuel 2010 while accounting for differential capture heterogeneity (Jennelle et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two data sources (observation vectors) are coupled to an underlying process model, which can take the form of a classical matrix projection model (the structure of the model is arbitrary). As such, it would seem to be relatively straightforward to use point counts of individuals observed in a particular disease state to augment a discrete-time disease model (e.g., Oli et al 2006; see also ''Appendix A'') in a SSM. Recent SSM integration of multisite recruitment, census, and mark-recapture-recovery data (Borysiewicz et al 2009) could conceptually be extended to accommodate multiple disease states in the same way.…”
Section: Working With the Likelihoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameter estimation and analysis of systems of discrete-time equations, also called matrix models, have seen broad application in population ecology (Caswell 1988). Their use to portray disease dynamics has been advocated (Dobson and Foufopoulos 2001, Oli et al 2006, Allen and van den Driessche 2008, Klepac and Caswell 2011, but matrix population models representing the influence of disease on host dynamics have rarely been fit with data (Cahn et al 2011, Muths et al 2011, Perez-Heydrich et al 2012. Assimilating matrix population models with data on diseases offers a major advance by applying welldeveloped tools in population ecology to questions in disease ecology.…”
Section: Data Assimilation For Models Of Infectious Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deterministic model A (t) n (tÀ1) (Oli et al 2006) predicts the means of the eight element state vector n (t) ( Table 2) based on the true state of the population at t À 1 and parameters in the projection matrix A (t) ( Fig. 2; Appendix D).…”
Section: Process Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation