Population dynamics of<i>Varroa destructor</i>in colonies of<i>Apis mellifera macedonica</i>in Greece

Kokkinis, Michel; Liakos, V.

doi:10.1080/00218839.2004.11101127

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the absence of V. destructor and improving nectar and pollen foraging conditions, bee strength showed a significant increase. Similar observations were made by Kokkinis and Liakos (2004).…”

Section: Comparison Of Sampling Methodssupporting

confidence: 78%

“…Earlier study also indicated two peaks of V. destructor population (Kokkinis and Liakos, 2004;Delaplane et al, 2005). Average mite population per colony showed a period of stabilization or marginal increase characterized by fluctuation from May to August-September in both the sampling methods in the present study.…”

Section: Effect Of Mite Infestation On Colony Build-up and Storesmentioning

confidence: 49%

“…Average mite population per colony showed a period of stabilization or marginal increase characterized by fluctuation from May to August-September in both the sampling methods in the present study. However, Kokkinis and Liakos (2004) and Calatayud and Verdu (1995) showed an increase from end of March to mid August and end of April to mid October, respectively, corresponding to a rate of daily finite increase of 1.0168 and 1.0177 in first and second year of study. The change in number of mites during various months may be due to different seasons in different geographical location of bee colonies around the world.…”

Section: Effect Of Mite Infestation On Colony Build-up and Storesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparative evaluation of sticky paper and hive debris as sampling methods for population assessment of <italic>Varroa destructor</italic> in <italic>Apis mellifera</italic> colonies

Asha

Gulati

Sharma

et al. 2015

IJARe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the present investigation, two sampling methods for V. destructor; hive debris and sticky paper method was compared year around in A. mellifera colonies to know the viable method. Between the two methods, sticky paper method was found significantly better (CD = 0.11; p = 0.05). More mitefall was recorded in sticky paper method (17.58 mites/hive) than in hive debris sampling (11.41 mites/hive). Fortnightly data analysis showed two peaks of Varroa; one in second fortnight of May and other in first fortnight of July in both sampling methods. Maximum number of mites (63.27 mites/hive) was recorded in second fortnight of May in both sampling methods which was significantly higher than the mites recorded at other observation periods (CD = 0.38; p = 0.05).

show abstract

Section: Comparison Of Sampling Methodssupporting

confidence: 78%

Section: Effect Of Mite Infestation On Colony Build-up and Storesmentioning

confidence: 49%

Section: Effect Of Mite Infestation On Colony Build-up and Storesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative evaluation of sticky paper and hive debris as sampling methods for population assessment of <italic>Varroa destructor</italic> in <italic>Apis mellifera</italic> colonies

Asha

Gulati

Sharma

et al. 2015

IJARe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kokkinis and Liakos (2004) estimated the average number of mites per adult bee as 7.3 and 7.0 in first and second year of their study with highest value in the end November (17.8 ± 1.8) and end September (12.6 ± 2), respectively. Bowen-Walker and Gunn (2001) It was estimated that for every female mite present during the bees' development, the host would lose 3% of its body water.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman infestation on Apis mellifera L. adults

Asha

Gulati

Thakur

et al. 2013

JANS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maximum incidence of Varrosis on adults of Apis mellifera L. (8%) was recorded in second fortnight of May 2008 corresponds to the peak in V. destructor population. Percent deformity was calculated by observing 100 adult bees. Deformity in adult bees was low which ranged between 0.0 to 3.0 per cent with an average of 0.52 per cent. Significant positive correlation (r = 0.77) was calculated between per cent mite infestation and per cent bee deformity which revealed that with increase in mite infestation, there was a corresponding increase in deformity of bees.

show abstract

“…Науковці зазначають, що впродовж останніх ро-ків паразит Varroa destructor є одним із найбільш небезпечних шкідників медоносних бджіл (Apis mellifera). Поширення вароозу прийняло харак-тер панзоотій і охопило всі райони світу, де мо-жливе проживання медоносних бджіл [12, 13,14]. На території Житомирської області, згідно з офіційними даними, найбільш розповсюдженою паразитарною хворобою за останні 8 років є варооз, що становить 58 % від усіх паразитарних хвороб [2].…”

unclassified

Біологічні особливості сезонної динаміки Varroa destructor (Anderson and Trueman, 2000) в умовах Полтавської області

Євстаф’єва¹,

Назаренко²

2018

visnyk

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Population dynamics ofVarroa destructorin colonies ofApis mellifera macedonicain Greece

Cited by 5 publications

References 42 publications

Comparative evaluation of sticky paper and hive debris as sampling methods for population assessment of <italic>Varroa destructor</italic> in <italic>Apis mellifera</italic> colonies

Comparative evaluation of sticky paper and hive debris as sampling methods for population assessment of <italic>Varroa destructor</italic> in <italic>Apis mellifera</italic> colonies

Effect of Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman infestation on Apis mellifera L. adults

Біологічні особливості сезонної динаміки Varroa destructor (Anderson and Trueman, 2000) в умовах Полтавської області

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About