2010
DOI: 10.1577/m08-078.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Composition, Migration Timing, and Harvest of Columbia River Chinook Salmon in Late Summer and Fall

Abstract: We used radiotelemetry to evaluate population composition, run timing, and reservoir harvest patterns for adult Columbia River fall-run Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Chinook salmon (n ¼ 5,886) were collected at Bonneville Dam during August-October over 7 years. We selected for upriver bright (URB) populations en route to interior basin spawning sites because these groups are priority populations for both fisheries and conservation efforts. Run composition varied within and among years, but in all ye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is logistically difficult to proportionately sample salmon at Bonneville Dam (and at most sampling sites), because the timing and daily abundance of passing fish are highly variable within season and among years. As described above, the potential for timing-related bias was highest early in the migrations, when the run disproportionately includes salmon from the upper Columbia River (Jepson et al, 2010), and when there were temperaturerelated tagging restrictions. Under these conditions, the stratified method should provide better escapement estimates in terms of precision because it takes account of the variability or heterogeneousness within season.…”
Section: Comparisons Among Escapement Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is logistically difficult to proportionately sample salmon at Bonneville Dam (and at most sampling sites), because the timing and daily abundance of passing fish are highly variable within season and among years. As described above, the potential for timing-related bias was highest early in the migrations, when the run disproportionately includes salmon from the upper Columbia River (Jepson et al, 2010), and when there were temperaturerelated tagging restrictions. Under these conditions, the stratified method should provide better escapement estimates in terms of precision because it takes account of the variability or heterogeneousness within season.…”
Section: Comparisons Among Escapement Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A likely explanation is that some Chinook salmon that pass Priest Rapids Dam in the fall-run period defined by managers (14 August to 15 November) are counted as closely related summer-run populations that should probably be considered part of a continuum of oceantype, upriver bright populations (Myers et al, 1998;Brannon et al, 2004). Therefore, date-based escapement estimates can easily be biased by migration timing or relative population size of the respective summer and fall components as currently defined (Dauble and Mueller, 2000;Jepson et al, 2010). These date effects apply both to the timing of tagging at Bonneville Dam (for mark-recapture studies) and to escapement estimates based on salmon counts at upstream dams.…”
Section: Comparisons Among Escapement Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations