2020
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6903a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population-Based Surveillance for Birth Defects Potentially Related to Zika Virus Infection — 22 States and Territories, January 2016–June 2017

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
23
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Birth prevalence of microcephaly, which was monitored before the ZIKV outbreak in Costa Rica, increased by almost 4-fold after the ZIKV outbreak, from 4.2 cases/10,000 live births to 15.5 cases/10,000 live births. Although we recognize that the birth prevalence of this defect may be underreported during non–ZIKV-epidemic times, these data are consistent with the experience in other countries, where the prevalence of microcephaly increased >4-fold (Colombia, French Polynesia, United States) ( 7 , 24 , 25 ) and up to 9-fold (Brazil) ( 30 , 31 ). Heightened awareness of the possible association between congenital ZIKV infection and microcephaly, as well as country-specific protocols to improve identification of this traditionally underascertained birth defect, probably contributed to increased prevalence estimates ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Birth prevalence of microcephaly, which was monitored before the ZIKV outbreak in Costa Rica, increased by almost 4-fold after the ZIKV outbreak, from 4.2 cases/10,000 live births to 15.5 cases/10,000 live births. Although we recognize that the birth prevalence of this defect may be underreported during non–ZIKV-epidemic times, these data are consistent with the experience in other countries, where the prevalence of microcephaly increased >4-fold (Colombia, French Polynesia, United States) ( 7 , 24 , 25 ) and up to 9-fold (Brazil) ( 30 , 31 ). Heightened awareness of the possible association between congenital ZIKV infection and microcephaly, as well as country-specific protocols to improve identification of this traditionally underascertained birth defect, probably contributed to increased prevalence estimates ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In Costa Rica, most infants with ZBD were born ≈1 year after the onset of autochthonous circulation of ZIKV and 6 months after peak incidence of ZIKV infection among pregnant women. Similar findings have been observed in Brazil, Colombia, and the United States, where the peak incidence was observed ≈6 months after the ZIKV epidemic, corroborating a temporal link between ZIKV infection and associated birth defects ( 7 , 23 , 24 ). Most infants with ZBD were born to mothers who reported symptoms in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy (64%), consistent with other reports ( 25 – 29 ); however, because 36% were born to mothers who were asymptomatic, the proportion of infections in early to mid-pregnancy is probably greater.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Infants from approximately 7,500 completed pregnancies are monitored in this system. Second, the Zika Birth Defects Surveillance (ZBDS) is a population‐based surveillance system that collected data on 3,359 infants and fetuses who had a birth defect potentially related to ZIKV infection, regardless of ZIKV laboratory findings, in 22 U.S. states and territories from January 2016 to June 2017 (Olson et al, 2019; Smoots et al, 2020). Infants captured in both surveillance systems were matched to increase data completeness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a substantial proportion of pregnancies with in-utero ZIKV exposure result in babies without apparent defects. Only an estimated 5-15% of infants have ZIKV-related birth defects (13). Importantly, infants who are born apparently healthy can manifest developmental and neurocognitive deficits months to years after birth (4–7), even if maternal exposure resulted in asymptomatic infection (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%