2018
DOI: 10.1002/hon.2536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population‐based outcome analysis of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma in people living with HIV infection and competent individuals

Abstract: The prognostic factors and outcome of 58 acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (AR-DLBCL) patients from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, diagnosed from 2004 to 2011, were compared with those of 326 immunocompetent (IC)-DLBCL from the Hematology Division of the Amedeo Avogadro University (Italy) and the Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland. Median follow-up was 6 years; 5-year overall survival (OS) was 68% (95% CI: 63%-73%) in IC-DLBCL and 63% (95% CI: 49%-75%) in AR-DLBCL (P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(39 reference statements)
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, antibiotic prophylaxis is routine, maintenance rituximab is not standard practice, and more recent phase II and population-based studies completed in this era have suggested excellent disease control without the same propensity for causing infectious toxicities suggested by the earlier Kaplan trial. 19,[27][28][29][30][31][32] Our results are consistent with this evolution in literature and practice. In the current era, the benefit of rituximab appears to be safely realized when administered with concomitant immune reconstitution via HAART, thoughtful antibiotic prophylaxis, and careful selection of patients according to CD4+ cell count.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, antibiotic prophylaxis is routine, maintenance rituximab is not standard practice, and more recent phase II and population-based studies completed in this era have suggested excellent disease control without the same propensity for causing infectious toxicities suggested by the earlier Kaplan trial. 19,[27][28][29][30][31][32] Our results are consistent with this evolution in literature and practice. In the current era, the benefit of rituximab appears to be safely realized when administered with concomitant immune reconstitution via HAART, thoughtful antibiotic prophylaxis, and careful selection of patients according to CD4+ cell count.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Modern HAART is not associated with added myelosuppression and an emphasis on compliance has led to immune reconstitution even during the course of chemotherapy. Moreover, antibiotic prophylaxis is routine, maintenance rituximab is not standard practice, and more recent phase II and population‐based studies completed in this era have suggested excellent disease control without the same propensity for causing infectious toxicities suggested by the earlier Kaplan trial 19,27‐32 . Our results are consistent with this evolution in literature and practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…3 A population based outcome analysis of DLBCL in people living with HIV infection and competent individuals in Italy by Conconi et al in 2018, showed that DLBCL patients are more likely positive for hepatitis B virus (61% vs 4%) and hepatitis C virus (25% vs 13%) infections. 35…”
Section: Dovepressmentioning
confidence: 99%