2020
DOI: 10.3201/eid2608.200679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population-Based Estimates of Chronic Conditions Affecting Risk for Complications from Coronavirus Disease, United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
102
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, because the population size decreases with age, and, secondly, because the prevalence of chronic diseases reaches its peak around the age of 70 (probably because people with the condition of interest are more likely to be selected out of the population). 18 These results are in line with the already mentioned studies performed in the United States by Adams ML et al, 12 and with what has been observed so far in the COVID-19 age distribution in Portugal. The proportion of population at the highest risk found in this study is below what others have estimated for population at increased/high risk, 19,20 including Adams ML et al and Koma W et al (45.4% and 37.6% of US adults, respectively), 11,21 which is mostly the result of adopting another definition of risk (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, because the population size decreases with age, and, secondly, because the prevalence of chronic diseases reaches its peak around the age of 70 (probably because people with the condition of interest are more likely to be selected out of the population). 18 These results are in line with the already mentioned studies performed in the United States by Adams ML et al, 12 and with what has been observed so far in the COVID-19 age distribution in Portugal. The proportion of population at the highest risk found in this study is below what others have estimated for population at increased/high risk, 19,20 including Adams ML et al and Koma W et al (45.4% and 37.6% of US adults, respectively), 11,21 which is mostly the result of adopting another definition of risk (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…10 In order to project the potential population at highest risk for COVID-19, we used the latest available official demographic estimates from the National Institute of Statistics (INE 2018). 11 In this study, we adopted a definition of high risk, based on two different approaches: 1) similar to the one used by Adams ML et al, 12 which was based on the presence of specific chronic conditions; 2) age criteria, by using the cutoff of ≥ 65 years old, as defined by the CDC. 13 Thus, we used a more conservative definition of high risk than Adams ML et al This definition of highest risk, combining comorbidities and old age criteria, is thus a more restrictive one and has the potential to underestimate the population at risk [Appendix 1 illustrates results using a less conservative definition by considering old-age as just another risk factor along with the analyzed comorbidities (see Appendix 1: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14222/Appendix_01.pdf)].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have a wide variety of clinical manifestations. While > 80% of infected patients experience only mild illness [ 1 ], mortality rates of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been estimated to be 5–27% [ 2 , 3 ] in vulnerable populations, including older adults and patients with multiple co-morbidities [ 4 , 5 ]. For patients with mild disease, supportive care has been the preferred management strategy [ 6 ]; pharmacological treatments with possible anti-viral effects have been primarily used for patients with moderate-to-severe disease [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few recent studies have identified non-radiologic demographic and clinical predictors of mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia, including but not limited to patients’ age, ethnicity, and various underlying medical conditions [ [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] ]. Although the disease was primarily thought to be an entirely nonfatal illness in nonelderly healthy patients without underlying medical conditions, the reports from around the world have been opposing [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%