Popular support for military intervention and anti-establishment alternatives in Tunisia: Appraising outsider eclecticism

Abstract

Popular attitudes in support of authoritarian alternatives and weak party systems constitute important threats to democratic consolidation and the stability of new democracies. This article explores popular alienation from established political actors in Tunisia. Under what conditions do citizens support alternatives to the elites in power and the institutional infrastructure of a new democracy? Drawing on an original, nationally representative survey in Tunisia administered in 2017, this article examines three categories of popular attitudes in support of political outsiders.Military interventionism appears in people's preferences for anti-system politics-the most immediate challenge to the country's stability and democratic transition. Anti-political establishment sentiments are shown in people's preferences for an enhanced role of the country's main trade union as a civil-society alternative to political party elites. Finally, outsider eclecticism is the seemingly incoherent phenomenon of concurrent support for a civil society actor and the military as an 'authoritarian alternative.' Anti-establishment sentiments will continue to be an important element in Tunisian post-authoritarian politics, evidenced by the rise to power of Kais Said in the 2019 presidential elections and his 2021 decision to dismiss parliament. In turn, popular support for military intervention may have implications for the country's domestic security and peaceful transition.

States or social networks? Popular attitudes amid health crises in the Middle East and North Africa

“…2 At the time of our survey, Tunisia remained the only Arab democracy. While Tunisia's democratic transition has been volatile and uncertain (Albrecht et al, 2021), no other country in the Arab world has established similarly robust avenues of participation. Egypt, in turn, experienced a resurgence of authoritarian rule (Bellin, 2018).…”

‘How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Autocracy’: Kais Saied’s “Constitutional Self-Coup” in Tunisia

“…A political strife between an independent Head of the government, who was sustained by parties and had acted quite independently from Saied, and the "anti-party" president was born (Olivetti, 2021). Kais Saied's moralizing political view gained immediately popular support, and it was directly proportional to the chronic loss of popular support of an-Nahḍa (Albrecht et al, 2021), which abandoned its role as conventional Islamist movement in favor of being a more conventional political party to meet the demand of consensus (McCarthy, 2019). Between the election of the Constituent Assembly in 2011 and that of the ARP in 2019, an-Nahḍa lost one million voters (from 1.5 million to 571,000) and its share shrunk from 37% to less than 20% of the votes.…”

The social contract in Egypt, Lebanon and Tunisia: What do the people want?

“…Third, apart from the current health crisis, prevalent across the entire MENA region, specific sources of crisis exist in our countries. Tunisia, for instance, has undergone an uncertain political transition process from authoritarian rule to democracy that was associated with an economic downturn (Matta et al, 2019) and the increasing disillusionment of Tunisians with their political representatives and institutions, namely parliament and political parties (Albrecht et al, 2021). The country's political crisis culminated, on 25 July 2021, in the dissolution of parliament and dismissal of the government by president Kais Saied, which observers have interpreted as a 'power grab' (Grewal, 2021).…”