2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63109-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyoxometalate chemistry at volcanoes: discovery of a novel class of polyoxocuprate nanoclusters in fumarolic minerals

Abstract: Polyoxometalate (POM) chemistry is an important avenue of comprehensive chemical research, due to the broad chemical, topological and structural variations of multinuclear polyoxoanions that result in advanced functionality of their derivatives. the majority of compounds in the polyoxometalate kingdom are synthesized under laboratory conditions. However, Nature has its own labs with the conditions often unconceivable to the mankind. The striking example of such a unique environment is volcanic fumaroles-the na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The list of twenty most structurally complex minerals known so far given in Table 3 reveals the following most important complexity-generating mechanisms in minerals: the presence of large (sometimes nanometre-scale) clusters such as polyoxometalates or related finite-cluster structures (Krivovichev, 2020b) isolated from each other; such multinuclear atomic units possess a large number of atoms with different topological functions; the examples are ewingite, morrisonite, vanarsite, bouazzerite and postite; as a rule, natural polyoxometalate minerals are also highly hydrated, with the exception of arsmirandite and lehmannite, which are anhydrous polyoxocuprates formed in volcanic fumaroles (Britvin et al , 2020); the presence of large clusters linked together to form three-dimensional frameworks; the examples are ilmajokite and paddlewheelite (both minerals are also highly hydrated, which contributes greatly to their structural complexities); the formation of complex three-dimensional modular frameworks formed by cages of different sizes and topologies; this complexity type corresponds to paulingite-group minerals, fantappièite and sacrofanite (members of the sodalite–cancrinite ABC series (Bonaccorsi and Nazzareni, 2015; Chukanov et al , 2021), tschörtnerite, mendeleevite-(Ce) and rowleyite; the formation of complex layers with different combinations of modules (chains or rings); this type is characteristic for layered uranyl minerals (such as vandendriesscheite and gauthierite) and layered silicates (parsettensite); a high hydration state in salts with complex heteropolyhedral units (alfredstelznerite and voltaite-group minerals); the formation of ordered superstructures of relatively simple structure types; the examples are meerschautite (which is the only sulfide species in the list and was described by Biagioni et al (2016) as an expanded derivative of owyheeite) and manitobaite (that has a fivefold superstructure relative to alluaudite (Tait et al , 2011)); for further discussion on the relations between superstructures and complexity see Krivovichev et al (2019a, 2021), Kornyakov et al (2021) and Kornyakov and Krivovichev (2021). …”
Section: Most Complex Minerals: An Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The list of twenty most structurally complex minerals known so far given in Table 3 reveals the following most important complexity-generating mechanisms in minerals: the presence of large (sometimes nanometre-scale) clusters such as polyoxometalates or related finite-cluster structures (Krivovichev, 2020b) isolated from each other; such multinuclear atomic units possess a large number of atoms with different topological functions; the examples are ewingite, morrisonite, vanarsite, bouazzerite and postite; as a rule, natural polyoxometalate minerals are also highly hydrated, with the exception of arsmirandite and lehmannite, which are anhydrous polyoxocuprates formed in volcanic fumaroles (Britvin et al , 2020); the presence of large clusters linked together to form three-dimensional frameworks; the examples are ilmajokite and paddlewheelite (both minerals are also highly hydrated, which contributes greatly to their structural complexities); the formation of complex three-dimensional modular frameworks formed by cages of different sizes and topologies; this complexity type corresponds to paulingite-group minerals, fantappièite and sacrofanite (members of the sodalite–cancrinite ABC series (Bonaccorsi and Nazzareni, 2015; Chukanov et al , 2021), tschörtnerite, mendeleevite-(Ce) and rowleyite; the formation of complex layers with different combinations of modules (chains or rings); this type is characteristic for layered uranyl minerals (such as vandendriesscheite and gauthierite) and layered silicates (parsettensite); a high hydration state in salts with complex heteropolyhedral units (alfredstelznerite and voltaite-group minerals); the formation of ordered superstructures of relatively simple structure types; the examples are meerschautite (which is the only sulfide species in the list and was described by Biagioni et al (2016) as an expanded derivative of owyheeite) and manitobaite (that has a fivefold superstructure relative to alluaudite (Tait et al , 2011)); for further discussion on the relations between superstructures and complexity see Krivovichev et al (2019a, 2021), Kornyakov et al (2021) and Kornyakov and Krivovichev (2021). …”
Section: Most Complex Minerals: An Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…the presence of large (sometimes nanometre-scale) clusters such as polyoxometalates or related finite-cluster structures (Krivovichev, 2020b) isolated from each other; such multinuclear atomic units possess a large number of atoms with different topological functions; the examples are ewingite, morrisonite, vanarsite, bouazzerite and postite; as a rule, natural polyoxometalate minerals are also highly hydrated, with the exception of arsmirandite and lehmannite, which are anhydrous polyoxocuprates formed in volcanic fumaroles (Britvin et al , 2020);…”
Section: Most Complex Minerals: An Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the POM clusters in minerals are usually associated with crystallization from aqueous solutions. Britvin et al (2020) reported recently on the discovery of two fumarolic minerals, arsmirandite and lehmannite, which formed directly from volcanic gases. The basic structural unit in both structures is a novel nanoscale ($1.5 nm across) polyoxocuprate cluster with the composition {[MCu 12 O 8 ](AsO 4 ) 8 } (M = Fe 3+ and Ti 4+ , for arsmirandite and lehmannite, respectively; Fig.…”
Section: Polyoxocupratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in natrophosphate). The special case is exemplified by the polyoxocuprate clusters in arsmirandite and lehmannite, where they are immersed into a deficient NaCl matrix that stabilizes the cluster surface via ionic interactions (Britvin et al, 2020). Similarly to synthetic compounds, in the crystal structures of natural POMs, the clusters are held together via hydrogen bonds and ionic bonds to alkaline or alkaline earth cations that are much weaker than the Me-O bonds inside the clusters.…”
Section: Summary and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, polyoxocuprates (POCus) have been distinguished, showing cross-structural topological transformations related to their multiple physical properties in homogeneous photocatalysis, medical chemistry, molecular magnetism, and quantum computing [8]. Recent discoveries of new rare and complex minerals demonstrate the presence of natural POMs and POCus in geochemical systems [9,10]. Here, we report the hydrothermal synthesis, crystal structure, and physical properties of new complex copper phosphate chloride, Na 2 Li 0.75 (Cs,K) 0.5 [Cu 5 (PO 4 ) 4 Cl]•3.5(H 2 O,OH), which is a new member of the polysomatic series of the lavendulan mineral group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%