2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymers in conventional and alternative lithography for the fabrication of nanostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, patterning materials with nanoscale features aimed at improving integration and device performance poses several challenges. The limitations of conventional lithography techniques related to resolution, operational costs and lack of flexibility to pattern organic and novel materials have motivated the development of unconventional fabrication methods [1][2][3] .…”
Section: Published Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, patterning materials with nanoscale features aimed at improving integration and device performance poses several challenges. The limitations of conventional lithography techniques related to resolution, operational costs and lack of flexibility to pattern organic and novel materials have motivated the development of unconventional fabrication methods [1][2][3] .…”
Section: Published Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, patterning materials with nanoscale features aimed at improving integration and device performance poses several challenges. The limitations of conventional lithography techniques related to resolution, operational costs and lack of flexibility to pattern organic and novel materials have motivated the development of unconventional fabrication methods [1][2][3] .Since the first patterning experiments performed with a scanning probe microscope in the late 80s, scanning probe lithography (SPL) has emerged as an alternative lithography for academic research that combines nanoscale feature-size, relatively low technological requirements and the ability to handle soft matter from small organic molecules to proteins and polymers. Scanning probe lithography experiments have provided striking examples of its capabilities such as the ability to pattern 3D structures with nanoscale features 4 , the fabrication of the smallest field-effect transistor 5 or the patterning of proteins with 10 nm feature size 6 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different mask-less lithography techniques are developed whose key advantage is the ability to change lithography patterns from one run to the next, without incurring the cost of generating a new photomask. Some of the maskless techniques include electron beam lithography (EBL), focused ion beam (FIB) lithography, scanning probe lithography (SPL), direct laser writing (DLW) technique, and dip pen lithography (DPL) [4][5][6][7][8]. Optical waveguides and devices using SU-8 material are of today's interest due to their potential applications in optical communications, optical interconnect, and integrated optics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative methods for high-resolution patterning of soft polymers have found some success, and include nano-imprint lithography or stamping 23,24 , and self-assembly 1,25 ; these methods allow for highly parallelized fabrication of submicron structures on polymer substrates. All such approaches pose problems for fabrication of implantable microdevices, including difficulties aligning multi-layer patterns, restrictions on material choice, and for nano-imprint lithography, use of high temperatures and pressures, which can deform polymer substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%