2018
DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20170871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymerase Chain Reaction and blood culture for diagnosis of canine sepsis

Abstract: Sepsis is characterized by the presence of organ dysfunction secondary to the dysregulated systemic inflammatory response associated with an infection, and has high mortality rates. Traditional diagnostic techniques based on non-microbiological isolation are time-consuming and may delay treatment. Thus, this study aimed to compare bacterial and fungal broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and blood culture for diagnosis of sepsis in dogs. Blood samples from 88 dogs with suspected sepsis were analyzed by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The yield of positive blood cultures matched our hypothesized proportion of 20%, which was toward the lower end of the range of previously reported literature 3–7,9,11 . Given the low number of submissions and reasons for blood culture that we documented, it is likely that this cohort reflects a highly selected population whereby the diagnosis was obscure, blood culture was thought to be of high yield, or direct culture from the source of infection was difficult.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The yield of positive blood cultures matched our hypothesized proportion of 20%, which was toward the lower end of the range of previously reported literature 3–7,9,11 . Given the low number of submissions and reasons for blood culture that we documented, it is likely that this cohort reflects a highly selected population whereby the diagnosis was obscure, blood culture was thought to be of high yield, or direct culture from the source of infection was difficult.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…There is no consensus on obtaining blood cultures routinely in companion animals with suspected sepsis, and there is a paucity of evidence concerning their utility. The reported yield of positive blood culture in varied cohorts of dogs and cats is 15%–49% 3–9 . However, these studies were not necessarily focused on the general utility of blood culture, and many are outdated 4,6,7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that the current veterinary definitions will be ultimately reconsidered because there is no consensus in veterinary medicine (SHARP, 2019); however, other authors do not know whether Sepsis-3 applies to veterinary medicine (LETENDRE; GOGGS, 2018). Therefore, the criteria chosen in this study was defined by Hauptman et al (1997) and is still used by researchers for defining sepsis in dogs (WALTERS et al, 2017;HARDY et al, 2018;LETENDRE;GOGGS, 2018;SILVEIRA et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood cultures (BCs) are considered the gold standard diagnostic technique to identify and document bacteremia; however, they are expensive, and results may take several days. Advanced techniques such as matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have been proposed to reduce the timeline for identification of bacteremia, but these techniques do not provide information on in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility and do not replace the use of BCs in clinical practice ( 4 , 5 ). Additionally, conflicting results exist regarding the utility of PCR to detect bacteremia ( 5 , 6 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced techniques such as matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have been proposed to reduce the timeline for identification of bacteremia, but these techniques do not provide information on in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility and do not replace the use of BCs in clinical practice ( 4 , 5 ). Additionally, conflicting results exist regarding the utility of PCR to detect bacteremia ( 5 , 6 ). The cost associated with performing serial BCs remains a major challenge and has led to variations in standard operating procedures, such as a reduction in specimens collected to reduce the total diagnostic cost ( 7 , 8 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%