2015
DOI: 10.1039/c4sm02580f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer-mediated interactions and their effect on the coagulation–fragmentation of nano-colloids: a self-consistent field theory approach

Abstract: This feature paper reviews our recent efforts to theoretically model the effect of polymer mediated interactions on the coagulation-fragmentation of nano-colloids in different settings encountered in practical systems. The polymer-mediated interactions among nanoparticles play a key role in many biological and technological processes such as red blood cell aggregation, protein crystallization, self-healing of polymer composites, filler reinforcement of rubbers used in tire technology, etc. By developing and ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where δ(r) is the Dirac delta function, r is the distance to the filler center, and γ A,B is the adhesion energy per unit area, termed adhesion in what follows. Note that γ A,B can be measured 21,42 for a variety of polymer-filler pairs, which gives added practical convenience to the surface potential defined by Equation ( 4). It is reasonable to assume that the considered weak adsorption interactions do not significantly change the structure of the incompressible DBC in the vicinity of fillers, which significantly simplifies further derivation of W. Substituting Δw = w A À w B deduced from Equation (4) into the expression in the r.h.s.…”
Section: Immersion Energy Of Fillers In Dbc System: Adsorption Interactions Versus Osmotic Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where δ(r) is the Dirac delta function, r is the distance to the filler center, and γ A,B is the adhesion energy per unit area, termed adhesion in what follows. Note that γ A,B can be measured 21,42 for a variety of polymer-filler pairs, which gives added practical convenience to the surface potential defined by Equation ( 4). It is reasonable to assume that the considered weak adsorption interactions do not significantly change the structure of the incompressible DBC in the vicinity of fillers, which significantly simplifies further derivation of W. Substituting Δw = w A À w B deduced from Equation (4) into the expression in the r.h.s.…”
Section: Immersion Energy Of Fillers In Dbc System: Adsorption Interactions Versus Osmotic Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient ( ) of the delta function is the adhesion energy per unit area of copolymer block A ( B ) at the filler surface. is experimentally known [ 29 , 30 ] for most of the practically important polymer–filler pairs. Typically, is of the order of 10–50 mJ/m 2 .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature makes it possible, in particular, to adequately describe the effect of fillers on the LCST behavior of blends that is often observed in experiments [ 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 33 , 34 ]. The mentioned rigorous description of the thermodynamic effects caused by the presence of fillers relies on the consistent calculation of the excess thermodynamic functions [ 35 , 36 ]. This calculation makes it possible, in particular, to consistently calculate the main, osmotic contribution to the effect of fillers on the stability of polymer blends that was omitted in the previous work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%