2019
DOI: 10.21062/ujep/291.2019/a/1213-2489/mt/19/2/327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer Flow Influenced by Mold Cavity Surface Roughness

Abstract: Polymer injection molding is the most used technology of polymer processing nowadays. It enables the manufacture of final products, which do not require any further operations. Working of shaping cavities is the major problem involving not only the cavity of the mold itself, giving the shape and dimensions of the future product, but also the flow pathway (runners) leading the polymer melt to the separate cavities. This paper shows the influence of cavity surface roughness, polymer material (with different flow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were confirmed by multiple other tested materials, as can be seen in previously published studies [29][30][31][32]. The measurements indicate that rougher surfaces left after electrical discharge machining (Ra 4.4), milling (Ra 1.6) and grinding (Ra 0.8) consist of irregular structures, which are not fully filled by the hot melt during injection moulding.…”
Section: Flow Lengthsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These results were confirmed by multiple other tested materials, as can be seen in previously published studies [29][30][31][32]. The measurements indicate that rougher surfaces left after electrical discharge machining (Ra 4.4), milling (Ra 1.6) and grinding (Ra 0.8) consist of irregular structures, which are not fully filled by the hot melt during injection moulding.…”
Section: Flow Lengthsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, only a handful of these publications were concerned with the effect of the surface quality, its replication ability and the applied processing parameters on the final product. Furthermore, no complex study analysing the influence of surface quality on the flow length of a polymer or the effect of flow length on the mechanical properties has yet been completed [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are comparative costs also with different manufacturing processes. As can be seen, machining costs steeply escalate with decreasing surface roughness values [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat transfer coefficient (HTC) increased with the increasing of cavity surface roughness, which helped the polymer flow [ 26 ]. However, some other researchers believed that the cavity surface roughness hindered the polymer flow [ 27 ] or had no effects on the polymer [ 28 ] flow in the cavity. The reason for the contradiction was mainly due to the difference in cavity size, in particular, the thickness of the cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%