Polygamy: a cultural trait and maternal and child health

George, Theresa

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1981.tb03215.x

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, polygynous families differ in important functional aspects from nuclear households in that often there is cooperation between cowives, and extended family networks are commonly important sources of child care and labor (Shell-Duncan, 1994;Whyte and Kariuki, 1991). Some studies in African societies have found that children living in polygynous households are less likely to be malnourished than those in monogamous households (George, 1981), whereas others have found no such effect (Burgess et al, 1972;Desai, 1991;Vella et al, 1992;Sellen, 2000). The lack of consistent findings suggests that the effect of household type may vary under differing socioeconomic conditions.…”

Section: Family Typementioning

confidence: 99%

Child nutrition in the transition from nomadic pastoralism to settled lifestyles: Individual, household, and community-level factors

Shell‐Duncan

Obiero²

2000

Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research reported here examines child nutrition in a population that is currently experiencing a transition in subsistence, shifting from nomadic pastoralism to a variety of settled lifestyles. We investigate the range of nutritional consequences of settlement both within and between communities by examining individual, household, and community-level predictors of child nutritional status. Data are drawn from the Rendille Demographic and Health Survey, which contains anthropometric data from 1,088 children ages 6 months to 10 years, as well as socioeconomic data from 640 households drawn from one nomadic and four economically and ecologically diverse settled communities. Comparisons allow us to test the widely held assumption that settlement results in nutritional improvements. The examination of individual and household-level factors highlights several important influences on child nutrition. We find a complex interaction between gender and birthorder, whereby firstborn sons have significantly higher weight-for-height scores than other children, potentially reflecting preference under a system of primogeniture. We also find a complex interaction between defacto female-headed households, where males are absent for over half of the year, and economic status. Young children from poor female-headed households have significantly lower weight-for-height than other children, possibly due to the fact that these households are amongst the poorest in the entire community. However, young children from economically sufficient female-headed households actually fare better than their counterparts in male headed households, suggesting that in households with any discretionary resources, female heads prioritize food acquisition relative to other concerns. Finally, our comparison of child nutritional status across communities, while controlling for individual and household-level variation, does not support the contention that settlement is associated with nutritional improvements. Rather, the effect of community, and its associated changes in subsistence and lifestyle, results in either no nutritional changes, or in the case of young children in the lowland desert community of Korr, diminished nutritional status. Our results underscore the importance of considering variation in sample composition and socioeconomic status when performing community comparisons, and highlight the central role of women in influencing the nutritional welfare of their families.

show abstract