2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poly-substance use and related harms: A systematic review of harm reduction strategies implemented in recreational settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One potential approach may be to focus on the development of strategies aimed at enhancing the capacity of venues and their patrons to self-manage minor adverse events. A recent systematic review highlighted the variety of harm reduction interventions that have been conducted in recreational settings such as pubs and clubs, but few such interventions have been evaluated 30. Another potential strategy for harm minimisation may be to increase the availability of pill testing kits, which allow users to identify the contents of ecstasy pills, as regular ecstasy users have reported that they would make use of these kits if they were readily available 31.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential approach may be to focus on the development of strategies aimed at enhancing the capacity of venues and their patrons to self-manage minor adverse events. A recent systematic review highlighted the variety of harm reduction interventions that have been conducted in recreational settings such as pubs and clubs, but few such interventions have been evaluated 30. Another potential strategy for harm minimisation may be to increase the availability of pill testing kits, which allow users to identify the contents of ecstasy pills, as regular ecstasy users have reported that they would make use of these kits if they were readily available 31.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches are also often supported by the nightlife and alcohol industries and may not be well enforced. Despite these failings, a recent review (Akbar, Baldacchino, Cecil, Riglietta, Sommer & Humphris, 2011) found that these kinds of interventions were the most common available.…”
Section: Does It Work?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review of harm reduction strategies implemented in recreational settings (Akbar et al, 2011) finds that they are rarely properly evaluated. Interventions targeted at training service staff are the most common type of programme, and focus on topics such as how to recognise signs of intoxication and when and how to refuse service to patrons.…”
Section: Does It Happen?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the authors do warn that some widely promoted preventive interventions, such as pill testing projects and educational activities by experienced peers, have not yet been adequately evaluated through experimental designs. Furthermore, Akbar et al (2011) notes that whilst most studies focus on alcohol, very few focus on illicit drug use. Although recreational nightlife is clearly a hegemonic phenomenon, in accord with the aforementioned reviews, Akbar et al, (2011) draw attention to the lack of European studies in this field; 86% of the studies identified in this systematic review were interventions targeted at training service staff who may refuse to serve alcohol to intoxicated individuals, and a multi-component model was recurrent in the majority (58%) of initiatives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Akbar et al (2011) notes that whilst most studies focus on alcohol, very few focus on illicit drug use. Although recreational nightlife is clearly a hegemonic phenomenon, in accord with the aforementioned reviews, Akbar et al, (2011) draw attention to the lack of European studies in this field; 86% of the studies identified in this systematic review were interventions targeted at training service staff who may refuse to serve alcohol to intoxicated individuals, and a multi-component model was recurrent in the majority (58%) of initiatives. However, the authors concluded that the heterogeneity of the measures used to determine the effectiveness of implemented interventions makes comparisons between such strategies in order to determine best practices difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%