2008
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2008)134:2(197)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollution Source Identification of Accidental Contamination in Water Distribution Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, the Boolean measurement algorithm failed to calculate the injection magnitude because of the disconnected reaction between the network delay and the magnitude of concentrations. An optimisation method developed by Cristo and Leopardi [127] aimed to locate an accidental contamination source in water network by using the water fraction matrix concept. The method starts from the concentration data to select a set of candidate nodes from which the source location was identified to minimise the variation between estimated and measured concentrations.…”
Section: Simulation-optimisation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Still, the Boolean measurement algorithm failed to calculate the injection magnitude because of the disconnected reaction between the network delay and the magnitude of concentrations. An optimisation method developed by Cristo and Leopardi [127] aimed to locate an accidental contamination source in water network by using the water fraction matrix concept. The method starts from the concentration data to select a set of candidate nodes from which the source location was identified to minimise the variation between estimated and measured concentrations.…”
Section: Simulation-optimisation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Candelieri et al [147] employed a Bayesian approach to optimise the operation of pumps in water distribution systems. Little effort has been made to estimate the source probabilities [127]. An efficient experimental design for contamination source identification in ground water was discussed by Zhang et al [148].…”
Section: Probabilistic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational requirements may be reduced by using a pre-screening technique that eliminates infeasible solutions to reduce a priori the decision space in which the heuristic procedure must search. One such pre-screening method is the back-tracking algorithm reported by De Sanctis et al (2006), which aims at identifying all possible locations and times that explain contamination incidents detected by water quality sensors.Another approach, proposed by Di Cristo and Leopardi (2008), makes use of the pollution matrix concept to determine a group of candidate nodes that could explain discrete solute concentration measurements. In Liu et al (2011b), a predictive model based on LR analysis was examined to determine the likelihood that any given node is a contaminant source location, using the observed concentration values at sensors.…”
Section: Es-based Adoptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such prescreening method is the back-tracking algorithm reported by De Sanctis et al (2006), which is able to identify all possible locations and times that explain contamination incidents detected by water quality sensors. Another approach, proposed by Di Cristo & Leopardi (2008), makes use of the pollution matrix concept to determine a group of candidate nodes that could explain discrete solute concentration measurements. The focus of the study presented in this paper is to complement the available search methods by developing and testing a procedure for prescreening the network to assign a relative probability of each node being a candidate potential source.…”
Section: Contaminant Source Characterization Is Complicated Notmentioning
confidence: 99%