Polluting the Pair-instability Mass Gap for Binary Black Holes through Super-Eddington Accretion in Isolated Binaries

Abstract

The theory for single stellar evolution predicts a gap in the mass distribution of black holes (BHs) between approximately 45 and 130  M , the so-called "pair-instability mass gap." We examine whether BHs can pollute the gap after accreting from a stellar companion. To this end, we simulate the evolution of isolated binaries using a population synthesis code, where we allow for super-Eddington accretion. Under our most extreme assumptions, we find that at most about 2% of all merging binary BH systems contains a BH with a mass in the pair-instability mass gap, and we find that less than 0.5% of the merging systems has a total mass larger than 90  M . We find no merging binary BH systems with a total mass exceeding 100  M . We compare our results to predictions from several dynamical pathways to pair-instability mass gap events and discuss the distinguishable features. We conclude that the classical isolated binary formation scenario will not significantly contribute to the pollution of the pair-instability mass gap. The robustness of the predicted mass gap for the isolated binary channel is promising for the prospective of placing constraints on (i) the relative contribution of different formation channels, (ii) the physics of the progenitors including nuclear reaction rates, and, tentatively, (iii) the Hubble parameter.Unified Astronomy Thesaurus concepts: Compact binary stars (283); Black holes (162); Accretion (14); Gravitational wave sources (677); High energy astrophysics (739 ); Binary stars (154)

Find the Gap: Black Hole Population Analysis with an Astrophysically Motivated Mass Function

“…An important future step will be to incorporate the stellar physics embedded in our prescription (Equation ( 5)) into the description of the pollutant population. In addition to second-generation black holes, this population will contain objects with significant postcollapse accretion (van Son et al 2020;Belczynski 2020) and also black holes formed after non-isolated, pre-collapse stellar mergers (Di Carlo et al 2020;Kremer et al 2020;Renzo et al 2020), all of whose mass functions and contributions to the merger rate should eventually be modeled appropriately and independently. Likewise, including primordial black holes (PBHs) will require a different population model (Hütsi et al 2021;De Luca et al 2021).…”

Beyond the Standard Model Explanations of GW190521

“…As discussed in detail in [2], the likelihood of hierarchical mergers depends strongly on the natal environment and the details of the initial black hole formation, but a larger number of high-precision events will enable statistical analysis of these effects. Alternatively, super-Eddington accretion (from common-envelope evolution or stable mass transfer) may "pollute" the mass gap [18,19], but a recent study in the context of a population synthesis model found no pairs with combined mass in excess of 100M [20]. These mechanisms for mass increase after black hole birth, though beset by uncertainties, will be better understood with dedicated modeling and additional observational constraints from future LIGO/Virgo runs.…”

Black Hole Genealogy: Identifying Hierarchical Mergers with Gravitational Waves

“…Measuring the bounds of the PISN mass gap will provide insights into stellar evolution and fundamental physics (Talbot & Thrane 2018;Farr et al 2019;Farmer et al 2019;van Son et al 2020). However, one needs to account for the dynamical processes that can lead to black holes in this mass range.…”