2011
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.46.11.1468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollination of ‘Hortblue Petite’ Blueberry: Evidence of Metaxenia in a New Ornamental Home-garden Cultivar

Abstract: ‘Hortblue Petite’ (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) is a compact, small-statured tetraploid blueberry that was introduced to the New Zealand retail sector as a garden ornamental in 2005. Pollination requirements for ‘Hortblue Petite’ have not previously been investigated and this study was undertaken to better understand compatibility with other blueberry cultivars. Pollen donor effects on fruit weight were significant; pollen from large fruiting cultivars produced bigger fruit in ‘H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, berry growth in blueberry is apparently affected by the pollen source. Shirley et al [12] reported that pollination by pollen from large fruiting cultivars produced larger fruit in ‘Hortblue Petite’ and that was evidence of metaxenia in blueberry. Metaxenia, which might be included in xenia because the definitions of xenia and metaxenia are somewhat different among researchers, is a phenomenon by which characteristics of the pollen parent are expressed in maternal tissues outside the embryo and endosperm in general [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, berry growth in blueberry is apparently affected by the pollen source. Shirley et al [12] reported that pollination by pollen from large fruiting cultivars produced larger fruit in ‘Hortblue Petite’ and that was evidence of metaxenia in blueberry. Metaxenia, which might be included in xenia because the definitions of xenia and metaxenia are somewhat different among researchers, is a phenomenon by which characteristics of the pollen parent are expressed in maternal tissues outside the embryo and endosperm in general [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Northern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), rabbiteye blueberry, and southern highbush blueberry (V. corymbosum interspecific hybrids) are the three most commercially important species cultivated (Yu et al, 2016). As not all of these species are self-compatible, the need for cross-pollination between botanical varieties is widely acknowledged by commercial growers (Miller et al, 2011;M€ uller et al, 2013), and pollination by bees is required to improve yield and quality (Nicholson and Ricketts, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This recommendation is based on previous research describing the benefits of cross-pollination among cultivated blueberry species. Cross-pollination has typically been associated with improved fruit set in northern highbush blueberry [V. corymbosum (Bailey, 1938;Coville, 1921;Dogterom et al, 2000;Ehlenfeldt, 2001;MacKenzie, 1997;Meader and Darrow, 1947;Miller et al, 2011;Morrow, 1943)], rabbiteye blueberry [Vaccinium virgatum (Darnell and Lyrene, 1989;El-Agamy et al, 1981;Gupton and Spiers, 1994;Meader and Darrow, 1944;Payne et al, 1989)], lowbush (Vaccinium angustifolium) and half-high blueberry (V. corymbosum · V. angustifolium hybrids) (Aalders and Hall, 1961;Harrison et al, 1994;Rabaey and Luby, 1988;Wood, 1968), and SHB (Chavez and Lyrene, 2009;El-Agamy et al, 1981;Gupton and Spiers, 1994;Lyrene, 1989). In contrast, greater fruit set in a cultivar after self-pollination compared with cross-pollination has been observed infrequently and has often been attributed to reduced compatibility with the pollen source used for cross-pollination (Ehlenfeldt, 2001;Gupton, 1984;Lang and Danka, 1991;White and Clark, 1939).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%