2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-012-0720-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollen morphology of the genus Iris L. (Iridaceae) from Croatia and surrounding area: taxonomic and phylogenetic implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…×rotschildii has a small amount of fertile pollen grains, similar to I. ×sambucina (Mitić et al 2013). The diploid plant collected by F. Kušan in Mt.…”
Section: Understanding the Name Of Iris ×Germanicamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…×rotschildii has a small amount of fertile pollen grains, similar to I. ×sambucina (Mitić et al 2013). The diploid plant collected by F. Kušan in Mt.…”
Section: Understanding the Name Of Iris ×Germanicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plant was initially connected with I. aphylla (Horvat & Horvat 1962) and later was synonymised with I. ×germanica (Barker & Govaerts 2018), but Mitić et al (2013) presumed that I. croatica could be an autotetraploid of I. pallida s.l. In our opinion, this tetraploid probably arose as a result of polyploidisation of backcrossed hybrid progenies between I. pallida × I. variegata (I.…”
Section: Croaticamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, wide distribution, morpho-ecological diversity, multiple hybridisations, and convergent evolution processes, make definitive statements of the origin and evolution of taxa in the genus Iris very difficult [ 4 , 5 ]. To resolve a myriad of uncertainties and issues related to taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships within the genus Iris , extensive work was performed on morpho-anatomical features, palynology, phytochemical constituents’ analysis, cytogenetic traits, and molecular analysis [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Despite different approaches to lower (and individual) taxonomic categories, most authors agree on the classification of the genus Iris into six subgenera, which are divided into sections and series [ 1 , 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broad Alpine-Dinaric, as well as the surrounding Mediterranean and Pannonian area of Europe (where irises for our study were sampled) is characterised by peculiar eco-climate conditions which have caused a great morphological variability of some Iris populations and groups. Their variety has resulted in ambiguous systematic status of some regional, especially endemic, Iris taxa [ 5 , 8 ]. Some of them are recognised in the national and regional floras [ 12 , 13 ] and still have an unclear phylogenetic and classification status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Більшість класифікацій роду Iris, які ґрунтуються на морфології та част ко во доповнені мо ле ку лярно-філогенетичними дослідженнями [36,85,109,[117][118][119][120], про по ну ють поділ роду на 6 [36,60,61] чи більше [87,120] підродів [65].…”
unclassified