Politik Hukum Perlindungan Hakim

Akbar, Faisal

doi:10.15408/jch.v4i1.2621

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, the task of the judge is very heavy when deciding a case and the judge should decide as fairly as possible. Because the law is formed by the norms and values of society, judges should be able to find the deepest meaning of justice in society (Faisal, 2016). ikewise, in the value of justice, society wants to live justly according to its proportions, so when it forms a rule, it wants the result of that rule to achieve distributive justice for each individual (Gordon & Newman, 2021).…”

Section: The Social Justice Perspective On the Constitutional Court V...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Legal Reasoning of the Constitutional Court Verdict Number 25/PUU-XX/2022 on the State Capital Law According to Social Justice Value

Farid

Nanik

2023

jurisprudence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of the study: This study analyzes the legal reasoning of the Constitutional Court judges in deciding the judicial review Number 25/PUU-XX/2022 against Law Number 3 of 2022 concerning the State Capital (Undang-Undang Ibu Kota Negara/State Capital Law), as well as analyzed based on social justice theory. Methodology: This study uses a juridical-normative method through a statute approach and case studies. The method of analysis is carried out qualitatively, while the method of collecting legal materials is through documentary research. Results: An analysis of the Constitutional Court verdict concluded that the panel of judges considered that the State Capital Law was declared constitutional to the Constitution and rejected the review of the State Capital Law. The plaintiffs also did not have strong legal standing in the process of forming the State Capital Law. The judges had the opinion that all processes for establishing the State Capital Law met the formal and material requirements. Unfortunately, the Constitutional Court verdict has not fully met the value of social justice for society. Applications of this study: This research is expected to provide a contribution to constitutional law and provide scientific recommendations for the public in cases of judicial review at the Constitutional Court. Novelty/Originality of this study: The Constitutional Court’s verdict is final and binding, whether it fulfills the value of social justice or not. However, the constitutional value should be directly proportional to the value of justice for society. The Constitutional Court verdicts should have an equal proportion of justice for society and the government. Keywords: Constitutional Court Verdict; Constitutional; Legal Reasoning; Social Justice; State Capital Law. ABSTRAK Tujuan: Kajian ini menganalisis pertimbangan hukum hakim konstitusi dalam memutus uji materil Nomor 25/PUU-XX/2022 terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 tentang Ibu Kota Negara, serta dianalisis berdasarkan teori keadilan sosial. Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif melalui pendekatan undang-undang dan studi kasus. Metode analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif, sedangkan metode pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui penelitian dokumenter. Hasil: Analisis putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi menyimpulkan bahwa majelis hakim menilai UU Ibukota Negara dinyatakan konstitusional terhadap UUD dan menolak pengujian UU Ibukota Negara. Para penggugat juga tidak memiliki legal standing yang kuat dalam proses pembentukan UU Ibukota Negara. Majelis hakim berpendapat bahwa semua proses pembentukan UU Ibukota Negara telah memenuhi syarat formil dan materil. Sayangnya, putusan MK belum sepenuhnya memenuhi nilai keadilan sosial bagi masyarakat. Aplikasi penelitian ini: Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi terhadap hukum tata negara dan memberikan rekomendasi ilmiah bagi masyarakat dalam perkara uji materil di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi bersifat final dan mengikat, apakah memenuhi nilai keadilan sosial atau tidak. Namun, nilai konstitusi harus berbanding lurus dengan nilai keadilan bagi masyarakat. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi harus memiliki proporsi keadilan yang sama bagi masyarakat dan pemerintah. Kata kunci: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi; Konstitusional; Penalaran Hukum; Keadilan sosial; Ibu kota Negara.

show abstract

Section: The Social Justice Perspective On the Constitutional Court V...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Legal Reasoning of the Constitutional Court Verdict Number 25/PUU-XX/2022 on the State Capital Law According to Social Justice Value

Farid

Nanik

2023

jurisprudence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Selama lembaga pengadilan yang masih belum bersih, transparan, akuntabel dan berintegritas, Komisi Yudisial masih diperlukan. 20 merekrut hakim hanya boleh dilakukan oleh pihak Mahkamah Agung sendiri tanpa campur tangan pihak lain. Mahkamah Agung semakin menjadi lembaga superbody tanpa pengawasan dari Komisi Yudisial dalam rekruitmen hakim.…”

Section: Sebetulnya Keterlibatan Komisiunclassified

Kontroversi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Membatalkan Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Melakukan Rekrutmen Terhadap Hakim

Suparto

2020

SASI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Supreme Court conducted a selection of judges without the involvement of the Judiciary Committee. The Judiciary Committee deemed the recruitment was violating the law since it was not involving them in the process. While the Supreme Court viewed that the implementation guidelines for the mutual regulation of the Judiciary Committee and Supreme Court was yet to be existed, while the need for fresh judges was deemed as urgent at that time. Based on that premise, the Supreme Court conducted the recruitment and appointment of judges, several supreme court judges and registrars were conducting a judicial review on the Law No. 49 of 2009, Law No. 50 of 2009, and Law No. 51 of 2009.The Constitutional Court granted their plea with Stipulation No. 43/PUU-XIII/2015.One of the points of considerations of the constitutional judges was the involvement of Judiciary Committee on the recruitment of judges was deemed to disrupt the independency of the Supreme Court. Actually, the involvement of the Judiciary Committee in the selection of judges will not intrude the independency of the judicial power or the judge itself. The independency of judges will be disrupted if the Judiciary Committee is intervening with the technical aspect of judicial power which includescross-examination, trial, and the verdict on a case.

show abstract

“…The quality of a prospective judge is guided by the judge's code of ethics and code of ethics as a state civil apparatus (ASN). According to (Faisal, 2016) in carrying out his duties as a representative of God on earth is not an easy case, the State of Indonesia must obtain good input in order to get qualified and professional judge candidates.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Development of the State Civil Apparatus Candidates for Judges Behaving Negatively in Realizing the Great Justice in Indonesia

Pratama

Mashuri

Apriliana

2020

VJJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The State Civil Apparatus (ASN) is an important element in carrying out the tasks of government and development in a country. In implementing governance and development, professional ASNs are needed, free from political intervention, free from corrupt, collusion and nepotism practices, able to provide public services to the community and able to play a role as the glue of national unity and integrity based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. as a tool requires guidance to improve the quality of human resources to work effectively and efficiently in providing services. the services provided to the community must be fair and comprehensive, especially in terms of providing services based on community rights so that justice in Indonesia can be realized. The State Civil Apparatus (ASN) prospective judges in Indonesia who are competent in carrying out their duties and functions will create a great court without negative attitudes or arbitrary actions of an officer. The State Civil Apparatus (ASN) guidance for prospective judges is important to improve the quality of ASN's work. The purpose of this paper is to identify the ASN model for prospective judges in realizing a large judiciary in Indonesia. This study uses a literature review method which is a research method by studying the literature or primary data sources used in research. From the results of research and data analysis, it can be determined that The State Civil Apparatus (ASN) coaching for prospective judges in Indonesia uses a coaching model based on employee discipline through the level of punishment from severe, moderate, and mild. See the position of Judge more priority to integrity than intelligence. Intelligence can be increased through various education and training programs. While morality which is the nature and basic nature can not be formed and improved. So prospective judges who behave despicably must be fired in order to realize a great court in Indonesia.

show abstract

Politik Hukum Perlindungan Hakim

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Legal Reasoning of the Constitutional Court Verdict Number 25/PUU-XX/2022 on the State Capital Law According to Social Justice Value

Legal Reasoning of the Constitutional Court Verdict Number 25/PUU-XX/2022 on the State Capital Law According to Social Justice Value

Kontroversi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Membatalkan Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Melakukan Rekrutmen Terhadap Hakim

Analysis of the Development of the State Civil Apparatus Candidates for Judges Behaving Negatively in Realizing the Great Justice in Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About