Politics and administration in times of crisis: Explaining the Swedish response to the COVID‐19 crisis

Abstract

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Switzerland's COVID‐19 policy response: Consociational crisis management and neo‐corporatist reopening

“…The common goal justified adding an exceptional technocratic element to the consociational structure of Swiss decision making, which received wide acceptance by the population and even among politicians. As highlighted regarding the Swedish case—another consensus‐oriented democracy (Petridou, 2020)—the recourse to public experts conveniently allows political authorities to limit the contradictory debate through the use of authoritative voices, thus smoothening the crisis management and fostering increased national unity (Premat, 2020).…”

Herd‐immunity across intangible borders: Public policy responses to COVID‐19 in Ireland and the UK

“…The UK government initially planned to tackle the pandemic by obtaining herd immunity, whereby society would gain immunity from the Coronavirus through widespread exposure. A similar approach was initially also taken in Sweden (Petridou, 2020).…”

The COVID‐19 policymaking under the auspices of parliamentary constitutional review: The case of Finland and its implications

“…The state of heightened uncertainty creates seemingly fruitful conditions for complex multicentric policy-making (e.g. Petridou, 2020). But while the early policy response to the COVID-19 crisis affirms that pandemics are complex problems, it simultaneously challenges some of the central premises of complex multicentric policy-making.…”