2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political voice on monetary policy: Evidence from the parliamentary hearings of the European Central Bank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same year, just over 25% of the written questions pertained to price stability and more than 50% of the interventions pertained to this topic in the resolution debates. In coherence with Ferrara et al (2020), Figure 1 confirms that MEPs also attempted to keep the ECB accountable on a broader set of issues distinct from the ECB's primary goal (Ferrara et al 2021). Until early 2020, virtually only left-wing MEPs were making interventions concerned with the climate topic 6 .…”
Section: Evolution Of Topics Between 2014 and 2021 Across Accountabil...supporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the same year, just over 25% of the written questions pertained to price stability and more than 50% of the interventions pertained to this topic in the resolution debates. In coherence with Ferrara et al (2020), Figure 1 confirms that MEPs also attempted to keep the ECB accountable on a broader set of issues distinct from the ECB's primary goal (Ferrara et al 2021). Until early 2020, virtually only left-wing MEPs were making interventions concerned with the climate topic 6 .…”
Section: Evolution Of Topics Between 2014 and 2021 Across Accountabil...supporting
confidence: 69%
“…The statements and answers of the ECB in this setting have also been scrutinized (Collignon and Diessner 2016;Fraccaroli et al 2018Fraccaroli et al , 2020Fraccaroli et al , and 2021Ferrara et al 2021). However, how the MEPs themselves have used this forum has remained largely overlooked by the literature (but see Ferrara et al 2021).…”
Section: Appendix a : Accountability Forums And Originalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sanders et al (2018) explore the differences between various types of hearings in the UK, including those of the Bank of England, and between hearings in the House of Lords and the House of Commons. Ferrara et al (2021) find that MEPs tend to lower their focus on price stability in their interactions with the ECB following higher rates of unemployment. Fraccaroli et al (2020) provide a comparative perspective, as they use text analysis to track the topics and sentiments in the hearings of the Bank of England, the ECB and the Federal Reserve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%