Political risk, internal versus global value chain knowledge, and subsidiary operational integration

Abstract

Research summaryThis study combines transaction cost economics and network learning literature to examine the moderating effect of knowledge from internal versus external local supplier on subsidiary‐level intrafirm trade within multinational enterprises' (MNEs) global value chain networks. We conceptualize knowledge in a multidimensional way, disentangling it into institutional knowledge in high‐risk countries and internationalization knowledge in all countries. Empirical results from 5,660 observations of 487 Korean MNEs (1995–2013) show that MNEs' institutional knowledge with external local suppliers in high‐risk countries has a stronger negative effect on the relationship between political risk and subsidiaries' intrafirm trade integration than with internal suppliers. Internationalization knowledge from external local suppliers in all countries also has a stronger negative effect on the relationship between political risk and subsidiaries' intrafirm trade integration than with internal suppliers.Managerial summaryA host country's political risk is a critical consideration for multinational enterprises (MNEs) when entering institutionally hazardous countries. This study shows how MNEs' strategies for operational integration of subsidiaries within global value chain (GVC) networks respond to challenges of political risk in host countries. We studied 5,660 observations of 487 Korean MNEs (1995–2013) and found that MNE capabilities to manage under institutionally hazardous conditions can be developed through various types of knowledge from internal versus external local suppliers, and, consequently, operational integration in the MNE GVC in high‐risk countries is less needed. MNEs need to acquire and expand new business opportunities in host countries by accepting heterogeneity through varying institutional and internationalization knowledge and active partnership development based on their GVC networks.

Towards Financing System of Integrated Enterprise Development in the Time of COVID-19 Outbreak

“…At the same time, the enterprise itself has clearly defined boundaries and is a source of income through efficient selection and allocation of resources. Meanwhile, the relationship is limited to bi-directionality (Frynas et al 2017;Lee et al 2020). Thus, companies using the replication integration model expand their development opportunities and increase their efficiency.…”

“…This model of a monolithic organization structure is formed by the aforementioned types of relations, and the enterprise itself has clearly defined boundaries and is a source of income through efficient selection and allocation of resources. Meanwhile, enterprise relationships are limited to bi-directionality (Frynas et al 2017;Lee et al 2020).…”

Brokerage that works: Balanced triads and the brokerage roles that matter for innovation

“…Accounting for the nested structure of data is important to avoid underestimation of the standard errors (Rabe‐Hesketh & Skrondal, 2008). Taking account of all these features, we employed a random‐intercept multilevel Tobit model using the metobit function in Stata v.15 (Lee et al, 2020; StataCorp., 2017).…”

Early evidence on how Industry 4.0 reshapes MNEs’ global value chains: The role of value creation versus value capturing by headquarters and foreign subsidiaries

“…This is because they have abundant internationalization experience, facilitating their production of intermediate goods to sell to GVC members. As a result, they are more dependent on internal value chains than on GVCs for their purchases of intermediate goods to enhance their operational flexibility and efficiency (Kano et al, 2020;Lanz & Miroudot, 2011;Lee et al, 2020;Lee, Shin, & Lee, 2015). In addition, an MNE that operates in many host countries is expected to have greater scope for both headquarters' divisions and foreign subsidiaries to engage in value-creating and value-capturing activities.…”