2015
DOI: 10.1177/1748048514568756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political parody and satire as subversive speech in the global digital sphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the Findus incident illustrates, content diffused on social media often uses humor to express evaluations of organizations and/or their products (Kumar & Combe, 2015). Humor is believed to fulfill a social need to connect by helping to convey emotions and knowledge, sealing bonds between people (Martin, 2010).…”
Section: Humour Cultural Jamming and The Subversion Of Organizationamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the Findus incident illustrates, content diffused on social media often uses humor to express evaluations of organizations and/or their products (Kumar & Combe, 2015). Humor is believed to fulfill a social need to connect by helping to convey emotions and knowledge, sealing bonds between people (Martin, 2010).…”
Section: Humour Cultural Jamming and The Subversion Of Organizationamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parodies may be seen as a kind of ‘subversive speech’ that use formal similarities to undermine the textual authority of the parodied object (Kumar and Combe, 2015). By directly imitating the form or style of a text, parody comments on it in some fashion.…”
Section: Satire and Parodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satire and parody become currency in this space, especially in authoritarian regimes (Mina, 2014), where ambiguity was (and still is) the only way to dodge censorship executed by the gatekeepers of the public. Thus, memes are not only acts of individual expression, they are also acts of subversive speech in a “risky game where parody accounts, mirror websites, fake usernames, and proxy servers allow participants to slip under the watchful radar of state agencies, that continue to finesse their skills at controlling and stifling online speech” (Kumar and Combe, 2015: 212). Participation and collaboration are necessary prerequisites for the emergence and virility of memes, but the cost of playing the game is relatively small.…”
Section: Games Political Expression and Cultural Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would simply make no sense for organized communication to allow too much variation of memes, since this would dilute the strategic message. As Kumar and Combe (2015) note, processes of play in the digital sphere "create an alternative space for social and political critique, outside the institutions of traditional media due to the proliferation of networked devices" (p. 211). While organized communication is mainly concerned with traditional media relations and the main platforms of social media, such as Facebook or Twitter, memes can dwell in the endless depths of the Internet, and thereby avoid the limiting conditions of the mainstream public arenas.…”
Section: Cultural Evolution and Memesmentioning
confidence: 99%