Political Orientation and Public Attributions for the Causes and Solutions of Physical Inactivity in Canada: Implications for Policy Support

Abstract

Objectives: To examine how public attributions for the causes and solutions of physical inactivity and individuals' self-identified political orientation are associated with support for different policy actions in addressing physical inactivity. Methods: A secondary data analysis was conducted with a sample of 2,044 Canadian adults. Two sets of 2 X 3 analyses of variance and post-hoc analyses were conducted to assess (1) the mean differences by the causes of the issue of physical inactivity (individual, or both internal and external/external) and political orientation (liberal, centrist, and conservative), and (2) responsibility for solutions (private matter, or both private and public health matter, and /public health matter) and political orientation on support for least, moderate, and most intrusive policy actions. Results: No interaction effects existed between causal attribution and political orientation on policy support, but a main effect of causal attributions for physical inactivity and political orientation was significant. Those who held internal attributions for the cause of physical inactivity showed less support for policies compared to those who held external causal attributions or both internal and external causal attributions. Conservative individuals reported the least support for all policy actions in comparison to liberal or centrist orientations. There were interaction effects between responsibility for solutions and political orientation on policy support. Conservative individuals who perceived the responsibility for solving physical inactivity as a private matter had less support for all three policy actions. Conclusions: Public acceptance of policy actions addressing physical inactivity varies by the attributions the public have regarding causes and responsibility for solving the problem, and by political orientation. Advocacy and messaging for policy implementation in the physical activity arena needs to be communicated in ways that encourage reflective and informed deliberation that is representative of the Canadian population.

United We Stand, Divided We Fall: Sociopolitical Predictors of Physical Distancing and Hand Hygiene During the COVID‐19 Pandemic

“…There is evidence that progressive/liberals are more likely to support policies and instructions that restrict individual rights but benefit the larger group. For example, liberals were more likely to support antiterrorism measures (e.g., phone tapping) in Norway (Rykkja et al, 2011) and intrusive physical‐activity policies in Canada (Yun et al, 2019). This also applies to health behaviors.…”

How to fairly allocate scarce medical resources? Controversial preferences of healthcare professionals with different personal characteristics

“…This finding is curious since it contradicts the idea that personal responsibility is more stressed by those on the right side of the political spectrum. There is evidence demonstrating that conservatives are generally healthier than liberals (Chan, 2019), and engage in healthier lifestyles (Subramanian et al ., 2009; Kannan and Veazie, 2018; Chan, 2019; Yun et al ., 2019). In contrast to the negative merit criteria, the reward of past usefulness or sacrifice (e.g., honourable social actions such as those impacting other peoples' health) received residual support from respondents.…”

When and Why Do People Accept Public-Policy Interventions? An Integrative Public-Policy-Acceptance Framework

“…Closely related to the work on control beliefs in the context of public-policy acceptance is whether people feel responsible for a certain problem themselves or see the responsibility as resting with others instead (e.g., the government). For example, a recent online study by Yun et al (2019) found that Canadians who attributed the causes of physical inactivity internally (vs. externally or both internally and externally) were less supportive of policies to address this problem. Similarly, Mazzocchi et al (2015) found that individuals who attributed blame for high obesity rates to external factors, such as the excessive availability of unhealthy foods, supported policies addressing such factors more.…”

“…Information about the political party behind the airport proposal mediated this effect. Also, in the domain of physical inactivity, when Yun et al (2019) examined how political affiliation affects policy support, conservatives (compared with liberals or centrists) showed less support. Importantly, the researchers found that conservatives who perceive the responsibility to solve physical inactivity as a private issue (internal attribution) showed lower support for all proposed interventions.…”

“…To whom people attribute control and responsibility for a certain event also depends on individual factors like political orientation. There is substantial empirical evidence across various decision-making contexts that political orientation needs attention in determining public-policy support (e.g., Gunarathne et al, 2020; Milner et al, 2019; Ramos et al, 2020; Yun et al, 2019). For instance, in a series of studies on the support for environmentally friendly airports, Milner et al (2019) found conservatives to be less supportive than liberals.…”