2016
DOI: 10.1177/1461444815580413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political information repertoires and political participation

Abstract: This study examines the relationship between various forms of media use and political participation. The major argument is that in today’s high-choice media environment, individuals and groups with the highest level of political interest are more likely to develop richer political information repertoires that involve exploiting both digital and traditional ways of searching for political information. Individuals and groups with richer political information repertories can be expected to have higher levels of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
55
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals tend to develop media habits which are repeated media consumption behaviours (LaRose, 2010) and news or political information media repertoires, which is the collection of media an individual uses to access news and political information regularly (Heeter, 1985;Wolfsfeld, Yarchi, & Samuel-Azran, 2016). Research has convincingly argued that, given multiple media to choose from individuals tend to habitually make use of a smaller subset of media available (Heeter, 1985;Wolfsfeld et al, 2016). These repertoires differ in terms of how many media are included, which media, and how those media might be combined.…”
Section: Media Diets In a High-choice Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals tend to develop media habits which are repeated media consumption behaviours (LaRose, 2010) and news or political information media repertoires, which is the collection of media an individual uses to access news and political information regularly (Heeter, 1985;Wolfsfeld, Yarchi, & Samuel-Azran, 2016). Research has convincingly argued that, given multiple media to choose from individuals tend to habitually make use of a smaller subset of media available (Heeter, 1985;Wolfsfeld et al, 2016). These repertoires differ in terms of how many media are included, which media, and how those media might be combined.…”
Section: Media Diets In a High-choice Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Respondents' media repertoires in today's high-choice media environment vary widely because of structural, sociodemographic, and habitual factors (e.g., Kim, 2014;Taneja, Webster, Malthouse, & Ksiazek, 2012;Wolfsfeld, Yarchi, & Samuel-Azran, 2016). In addition, repertoire fragmentation may be fueled by the large variety of content available on social networking sites, where respondents might have different views on what counts as "journalistic news."…”
Section: Proof-of-concept Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…u posljednjem razdoblju u političkoj komunikaciji sve se više koriste pristupi preuzeti iz istraživanja medijskih publika, kao što su primjerice medijski repertoari u istraživanjima publika vijesti (edgerly et al 2018;Strömbäck et al 2017;vozab 2016;Wolfsfeld, Yarchi and Samuel-azran 2016). otvaranje političke komunikacije prema drugim disciplinama, teorijama i metodologiji na način na koji su to učinile medijske i komunikacijske studije, te koje time prilagođavaju istraživanja brzim društvenim i (Karpf et al 2015; Kleis nielsen 2014).…”
Section: Političke Perspektiveunclassified