Political‐Administrative Relations: Impact of and Puzzles in Aberbach, Putnam, and Rockman, 1981

Abstract

Political‐administrative relations became an issue once politicians and administrators came to be considered as distinct actors in the public realm. This happened in the late eighteenth century, and several authors since then explored the nature of this relationship in normative and/or juridical terms. But it took almost two centuries before it became an object of systematic empirical study in a comparative perspective: Aberbach, Putnam, and Rockman (APR 1981). The APR study was the first to use survey methods and to advance empirically based theory. In this article we discuss the intellectual attention for this topic since the early nineteenth century, APR's findings and impact and—given APR's influence upon methods—some intriguing problems with the framework that they developed. Finally we list some potential new avenues of research.

Politicisation but not Responsiveness: Preferences and Experiences of New Zealand Councillors

“…The focus of the research is on the values that appointed managers at the local government level adopt in their relationship with EMs. It should also be noted that the respondents of those studies are appointed managers (Lee and Raadschelders 2008) while the respondents in this article are elected members.…”

Neutral – Neither Trustees nor Hired Guns: The Experiences and Preferences of Local Government Councillors of NSW Australia

“…Extant studies (see Gregory , ; Haidar et al. ; Lee and Raadschelders ; Pullin and Haidar ) rely on data from groups other than the ruling politicians who are the other party in the relationship with public servants. This study examines the perceptions of local level ruling politicians regarding their preferences and experiences of the values that guide local level public servants to shed more light on these relationships.…”

Government Programme as a Strategy—The Finnish Experience

“…Politics and administration were becoming hybridised, which meant there would be no need to separate political decision making from the formulation and implementation of goals [59]. Discussion of the division between politics and administration has not faded away [60] -even if we accepted a hybrid government, it would be problematic for politicians' accountability if administrators became responsible for decision making. Sometimes there is a genuine need to separate politicians and administrators, but we could equally see administrators as being responsive to citizens or autonomous in their administrative practice [61].…”