Policy-Making Processes and the European Constitution
Abstract:This new book presents a wealth of new data documenting and analyzing the different positions taken by European governments in the development of the European constitution.Understanding how constitutional decisions are taken in the EU is of great societal and scientific relevance. This volume examines how these decisions have substantial effects on the sovereignty of nation states and on the lives of citizens, independent of the ratification of a constitution.Few efforts have been made to document constitution… Show more
“…Thurner et al., 2002); others select a limited number of issues from a proposal by applying certain selection criteria to the full population of issues (see e.g. König and Hug, 2006); and still others confer the task of contested issue selection upon external experts, notably political decision-makers or administrative staff working at national ministries, member states’ permanent representations, or EU institutions (e.g. Bueno de Mesquita and Stokman, 1994; Thomson et al., 2012).…”
Section: The ‘Emu Positions’ Dataset: Concepts Data Collection and mentioning
The collection of articles in this special issue provides a comprehensive analysis of European Union decision-making during the Eurozone crisis. We investigate national preference formation and interstate bargaining related to major reforms of the Economic and Monetary Union. The analyses rely on the new 'EMU Positions' dataset. This dataset includes information about the preferences and saliences of all 28 EU member states and key EU institutions, regarding 47 contested issues negotiated between 2010 and 2015. In this introductory article, we first articulate the motivation behind this special issue and outline its collective contribution. We then briefly
“…Thurner et al., 2002); others select a limited number of issues from a proposal by applying certain selection criteria to the full population of issues (see e.g. König and Hug, 2006); and still others confer the task of contested issue selection upon external experts, notably political decision-makers or administrative staff working at national ministries, member states’ permanent representations, or EU institutions (e.g. Bueno de Mesquita and Stokman, 1994; Thomson et al., 2012).…”
Section: The ‘Emu Positions’ Dataset: Concepts Data Collection and mentioning
The collection of articles in this special issue provides a comprehensive analysis of European Union decision-making during the Eurozone crisis. We investigate national preference formation and interstate bargaining related to major reforms of the Economic and Monetary Union. The analyses rely on the new 'EMU Positions' dataset. This dataset includes information about the preferences and saliences of all 28 EU member states and key EU institutions, regarding 47 contested issues negotiated between 2010 and 2015. In this introductory article, we first articulate the motivation behind this special issue and outline its collective contribution. We then briefly
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.