Policy Implications of Changes in Work and Family Patterns

Renshaw, Jean R.; Cohen, Alan R.; Gadon, Herman; Meier, Gretl S.; Schreiver, Carol Tropp; Kanter, Rosabeth Moss; Golembiewski, Robert T.

doi:10.2307/3110269

Public Administration Review

1980

DOI: 10.2307/3110269

|View full text |Cite

Policy Implications of Changes in Work and Family Patterns

Jean R. Renshaw¹,

Alan R. Cohen²,

Herman Gadon³

et al.

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1980

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Client Perjury: The Kutak Commission and the Association of Trial Lawyers on Lawyers, Lying Clients, and the Adversary System

Wolfram¹

1980

Am. Bar Found. res. j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Attorney involvement in client perjury is a restive issue that does not admit of easy resolution. Many other issues are addressed by the Kutak Commission in its proposed revision of the American Bar Association's recommended rules of attorney conduct. But few have raised such a spirited professional and public debate as the Commission's broad proposal for required disclosure of client dishonesty. Whistle blowing by counsel is mandated in some instances, permitted in the attorney's discretion in others. Counsel for parties in negotiation are carefully circumscribed in presenting misleading information to others. And the lawyer whose client commits known perjury on the witness stand is under an explicit obligation to correct the perjury. All of these rules are part of the Commission's thematic development of a broad social dimension to the lawyer's work—a dimension that, in the Commission's view, requires more explicit recognition of the lawyer's obligations to third parties and to social institutions such as the courts to assist them in their work. The range of issues presented is very extensive, and the present review will deal only with the client perjury problem.

show abstract

Client Perjury: The Kutak Commission and the Association of Trial Lawyers on Lawyers, Lying Clients, and the Adversary System

Wolfram¹

1980

Am. Bar Found. res. j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Policy Implications of Changes in Work and Family Patterns

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Client Perjury: The Kutak Commission and the Association of Trial Lawyers on Lawyers, Lying Clients, and the Adversary System

Client Perjury: The Kutak Commission and the Association of Trial Lawyers on Lawyers, Lying Clients, and the Adversary System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About