Policy Change in Comparative Contexts: Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework Outside of Western Europe and North America

Henry, Adam Douglas; Ingold, Karin; Nohrstedt, Daniel; Weible, Christopher M.

doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.941200

Cited by 94 publications

(63 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…ACF menjadi pendekatan yang paling banyak digunakan untuk menjelaskan isu kebijakan dalam berbagai sistem kebijakan di banyak negara. Tidak hanya di negara-negara demokratis-maju seperti Amerika Serikat, Kanada, dan Eropa Barat (Henry, Ingold, Nohrstedt, & Weible, 2014), ACF juga sudah diaplikasikan di negara-negara berkembang seperti Indonesia (Elliott, 2000;Elliott & Schlaepfer, 2001;Leong, 2015), Kenya (Kingiri, 2014), Ghana (Ainuson, 2009) dan bahkan di negara yang otoriter seperti China (Han, Swedlow, & Unger, 2014). Kebanyakan kasus berkaitan dengan isu lingkungan.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

“…ACF adalah kerangka kerja analisis kebijakan yang membantu menjelaskan proses kebijakan dalam subsistem yang kompleks (Weible &Sabatier, 2009;Henry, Ingold, Nohrstedt, & Weible, 2014) dan menjadi salah satu alat analisis yang menjanjikan dalam studi kebijakan (Weible &Sabatier, 2009;Schlager, 1995). ACF dikembangkan dalam lingkungan kebijakan yang poliarkhis dengan tingkat demokrasi yang relatif matang seperti di Amerika Utara dan Eropa Barat.…”

Section: Advocacy Coalition Frameworkunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Konflik Dan Perubahan Kebijakan Di Pegunungan Karst Kendeng: Narasi Belief System Dalam Advocacy Coalitioan Framework

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Keywords:Advocacy Coalition Framework, Belief System, Sustainable Development.This paper aims to investigate the dynamic of environmental policy making in the effort of attaining sustainable development. Using Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) as a framework of analysis, our study was conducted in the Kendeng environmental conflict, Rembang Regency. Utilised both primary and secondary data on conflict properties from cement industry's proponents and opponents, researchers obtained vigorous data and evidence through which the ACF may offer a comprehensive explanation on policy process and change.Finding shows that the coalition of actor has a pivotal role to influence value and behaviour among policy actors in the Kendeng environmental conflict. The result of this study fills the lacuna of research which focuses the main discussion on advocacy coalition actor-based policy analysis. It also offers a policy agenda focusing on the belief system actor-based policy analysis in which Government of Indonesia worth to consider in the policy making process.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Section: Advocacy Coalition Frameworkunclassified

Konflik Dan Perubahan Kebijakan Di Pegunungan Karst Kendeng: Narasi Belief System Dalam Advocacy Coalitioan Framework

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, in a comparative analysis, some details must be sacrificed in the interest of clear, comparable variables with explanatory value (George & Bennett, ; Henry, Ingold, Nohrstedt, & Weible, ). Evaluating the ACF's applicability in developing countries, Henry et al () argue that combining the ACF with other theoretical approaches is a fruitful way to keep the framework's strengths while improving its shortcomings in analyses of non‐Western cases. Few studies have applied the ACF comparatively in developing countries—Gupta () being a notable exception.…”

Section: Understanding Climate‐policy Changementioning

confidence: 99%

The Ability to Influence: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Advocacy Coalitions in Brazilian Climate Politics

Aamodt

2018

Review of Policy Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cooperation between environmentalists, scientists, and governmental actors was a crucial driver behind Brazil's efforts to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the forest sector from 2004 onward. The same climate coalition's advocacy work to reduce emissions in the energy sector, Brazil's second‐most emitting sector, has been unsuccessful. Why has climate‐policy development been so different in the two sectors? Building on the advocacy coalition framework, this paper analyzes the climate coalition's role, systematically comparing how the coalition has worked to influence policy development in the two key sectors for Brazilian GHG emissions between 2003 and 2015. The paper finds that strong climate‐coalition unity, unambiguous scientific knowledge, economic growth, and international pressure functioned as a constellation of factors that enhanced the climate coalition's ability to take advantage of a climate‐policy window and frame deforestation as a core climate concern. The same constellation of factors was missing in the energy sector.

show abstract

“…Although an appreciation of cultural norms has long been standard fare for IAD (Ostrom, 1990), comparison beyond North America and Europe came later for other foundational approaches (Henry, Ingold, Nohrstedt, & Weible, 2014). While limitations of space prevent a detailed discussion of the insights gleaned from empirical studies of policymaking in the developing world, it suffices to say that analytical sensitivity to variables beyond institutional rules will be integral to avoiding forced fit as it pertains to the Western cultural biases some suspect underlie contemporary approaches to the study of public policy (Wong, 2014).…”

Section: S58mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Public Policy: Origins, Themes, New Directions

Wilder¹

2017

Policy Studies Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparative public policy combines theories of the policy process with the study of political systems and specific issue areas. Yet, some ambiguity surrounds what distinguishes the comparative approach from other perspectives on public policy. This review brings greater clarity to the comparative policy project by emphasizing the need to be attentive to similarities and differences regarding the institutional contexts in which policymaking takes place. This attention is necessary to avoid “forcing a fit” between the empirical reality and theories and frameworks designed with specific institutional configurations in mind. While forced fit posed problems for past research, recent theoretical advancements have been devised to facilitate comparison across dissimilar institutional settings. The following discussion highlights amendments to established approaches intended to deal with problems of comparison and identifies promising new perspectives from which comparative analysis may be conducted. The latest wave of comparative policy scholarship, having accounted for institutional variation, looks beyond institutions to policy discourses in order to explain how ideas, norms, and political culture affect how policy actors maneuver within, maintain, or change the institutional environment in which they operate.

show abstract

Policy Change in Comparative Contexts: Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework Outside of Western Europe and North America

Cited by 94 publications

References 60 publications

Konflik Dan Perubahan Kebijakan Di Pegunungan Karst Kendeng: Narasi Belief System Dalam Advocacy Coalitioan Framework

Konflik Dan Perubahan Kebijakan Di Pegunungan Karst Kendeng: Narasi Belief System Dalam Advocacy Coalitioan Framework

The Ability to Influence: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Advocacy Coalitions in Brazilian Climate Politics

Comparative Public Policy: Origins, Themes, New Directions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About